2022
DOI: 10.1007/s10237-022-01657-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Three-dimensional finite element analysis on cochlear implantation electrode insertion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A previously developed finite element model that focused on residual hearing found that cochlear implants most dramatically affect the residual hearing at extreme frequencies of human hearing [20]. This model provided a good first step towards further FE analysis of residual hearing after CI surgery, although it did not necessarily agree with the results of other models where residual hearing was found to be less affected by the simple presence of a CI electrode and more affected by the trauma caused during insertion [19,21]. However, the previous models did not examine the effect of varying cochlear electrode insertion angles between patients.…”
Section: Prior Fe Modelsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…A previously developed finite element model that focused on residual hearing found that cochlear implants most dramatically affect the residual hearing at extreme frequencies of human hearing [20]. This model provided a good first step towards further FE analysis of residual hearing after CI surgery, although it did not necessarily agree with the results of other models where residual hearing was found to be less affected by the simple presence of a CI electrode and more affected by the trauma caused during insertion [19,21]. However, the previous models did not examine the effect of varying cochlear electrode insertion angles between patients.…”
Section: Prior Fe Modelsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The absence of such measurements in clinical practice severely limits the investigation and quantification of the impact of insertion forces on hearing outcome from a scientific perspective. The available evidence from preclinical research suggests, that aside from the mechanical characteristics of the electrode array [including, for example, stiffness and surface friction properties; (11)(12)(13)], patientspecific anatomical parameters [such as cochlear size and curvature; (14,15)] also procedural factors [e.g., insertion trajectory, speed, depth; (16,17)] cause individual variations. Building upon this, a deeper understanding of this relationship may pave the way for the development of novel strategies that empower clinicians to identify and mitigate the risk of intracochlear trauma in real time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%