2017
DOI: 10.21608/scumj.2017.47300
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Three-dimensional Evaluation of Facial Harmony in Orthodontic Patients with Vertical Growth Pattern

Abstract: Aim: To three-dimensionally evaluate the facial harmony in orthodontic patients with vertical growth pattern. Materials and Methods: Cone-beam computed tomography (CT) scans were obtained in 10 normal occlusion adults (4 men, 6 women) with vertical growth pattern, and reconstructed into 3dimensional (3D) models by using a 3D image software. 3D position of 12 hard tissue landmarks, 3 midlines and 9 pairs of bilateral landmarks, were identified in 3D coordination system, and their right and left differences were… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 21 publications
(26 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Sample was divided into three groups according to their growth pattern to Normal facial pattern, hyper-divergent facial pattern and hypo-divergent facial pattern. Angles used was Y-axis angle, Facial axis angle, Gonial angle and Mandibular plane angle Fathallah et al (9) and Oksayan et al (5) . sing the Planmecca Romexis Viewer 5.3.3.5 software; virtual lateral cephalometric radiograph 2D image was extracted from the 3D cone beam radiograph (Figure 1).…”
Section: Sample Groupingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sample was divided into three groups according to their growth pattern to Normal facial pattern, hyper-divergent facial pattern and hypo-divergent facial pattern. Angles used was Y-axis angle, Facial axis angle, Gonial angle and Mandibular plane angle Fathallah et al (9) and Oksayan et al (5) . sing the Planmecca Romexis Viewer 5.3.3.5 software; virtual lateral cephalometric radiograph 2D image was extracted from the 3D cone beam radiograph (Figure 1).…”
Section: Sample Groupingmentioning
confidence: 99%