1983
DOI: 10.1007/bf01453994
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Three-dimensional em modeling

Abstract: Abstract. Three-dimensional (3D) interpretation of electromagnetic (EM) dsta is still in its infancy, due to a lack of practical numerical solutions for the forward problem. However, a number of algorithms for simulating the responses of simple 3D models have been developed over the last ten years, and they have provided important new insight. Integral equation methods have been more successful than differential equation methods, because they require calculating the electric field only in small anomalous regio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

1983
1983
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
(28 reference statements)
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The numerical observations of the effects of current perturbations due to 3D bodies are growing as workers consider models of greater and greater complexity. Fortunately, the subject of electromagnetic induction in 3D structures has already been reviewed at an earlier workshop (Hewson-Browne and Kendal, 1977), and there is a complete session on it at this one (Hohmann, 1983). Hence, I will merely pick out some of the interesting results of numerical modelling that shed light on the problem of current channelling.…”
Section: Za(co ) = At(o)) Ha(co ) ~-L~'(co) Oa(co ) 3ff ~mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The numerical observations of the effects of current perturbations due to 3D bodies are growing as workers consider models of greater and greater complexity. Fortunately, the subject of electromagnetic induction in 3D structures has already been reviewed at an earlier workshop (Hewson-Browne and Kendal, 1977), and there is a complete session on it at this one (Hohmann, 1983). Hence, I will merely pick out some of the interesting results of numerical modelling that shed light on the problem of current channelling.…”
Section: Za(co ) = At(o)) Ha(co ) ~-L~'(co) Oa(co ) 3ff ~mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The comparisons of our numerical results and their results are shown in the Appendix of Chen and Fung (1988). Another comparison for Hohmann's model (Hohmann, 1983) has also been carried out (Chen and Fung, 1989), and in that model the conductivity contrast is 200. All the results obtained by different methods agree well for the most part of the response curves.…”
Section: The 3-d Finite Difference Methodsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Second, because the materials in the earth's crust are only weakly magnetic the permeability of the subsurface rocks can be approximated by the permeability of free space ðμ ¼ μ 0 Þ. Moreover, in EM methods, the primary source of the EM fields can be either an impressed electric current density J p or magnetic dipole moment M p (Hohmann, 1983). Therefore, at any point, the total electric and magnetic fields (E and H) are related by the following form of Maxwell's equations in the frequency domain:…”
Section: Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%