1994
DOI: 10.1063/1.112775
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Three-dimensional electrostatic potential, and potential-energy barrier, near a tip-base junction

Abstract: Spectroscopy of Ar-SH and Ar-SD. II. Determination of the three-dimensional intermolecular potential-energy surface J. Chem. Phys. 123, 054325 (2005); 10.1063/1.1943968 Photodissociation of the water dimer: Three-dimensional quantum dynamics studies on diabatic potential-energy surfaces J. Chem. Phys. 123, 034303 (2005); 10.1063/1.1961614Methods for calculating electrostatic quantities due to a free charge in a nanoscale threedimensional tip/base junction J.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
33
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The most suitable of the models for our purpose is the hyperboloid or semi-ellipsoid model in which a solution for the potential and the field can be obtained in the prolate-spheroidal coordinate system. [24][25][26][27][28][29] A simpler derivation of the same result can be obtained by considering the field that is generated by a linear distribution of charges, whose density increases linearly along its length. 24,30 The electron-optical phase shift can also be calculated easily in this case.…”
Section: Theoretical Modelmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…The most suitable of the models for our purpose is the hyperboloid or semi-ellipsoid model in which a solution for the potential and the field can be obtained in the prolate-spheroidal coordinate system. [24][25][26][27][28][29] A simpler derivation of the same result can be obtained by considering the field that is generated by a linear distribution of charges, whose density increases linearly along its length. 24,30 The electron-optical phase shift can also be calculated easily in this case.…”
Section: Theoretical Modelmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…However, simplifying assumptions with respect to the tip geometry have been made. For example, Terris et al [1] restricted the mathematical formulation to a tip; Pan et al [2] assumed a tip geometry in the shape of a hyperboloid; Hudlet et al [3] limited the analytical formulation to an axisymmetric but otherwise arbitrary shaped AFM tip; Strassburg et al [4] suggested a numerical model based on the boundary integral equation method. Unfortunately, the use of the boundary integral equation method is possible only for domains with C 2 -smooth boundaries, i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various simplified models for the AFM tip shape have been proposed that obtain an expression for the electrostatic interaction, and hence capacitance, between an AFM tip and a molecularly smooth substrate. A few of the older models proposed are: a sphere model, 6 a uniformly charged line model, 7 a knife edge model, 8 a single charge model, 9 a perfect cone model, 10 a hyperboloid model, 11 and a plane surface model. 5 Belaidi et al 8 analyzed these models in detail and found that no single model describes accurately the capacitance between the AFM tip and sample.…”
Section: Historical Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%