About 30 years ago, clinical echocardiography started with B-mode. The dot jumping up and down on the monitor was difficult to interpret. M-mode was the next step, with a time axis added to the B-mode. Two-dimensional (2D) echocardiography was the next leap forward in noninvasive cardiac assessment. Currently 2D imaging is the core of every echocardiographic examination, together with M-mode, pulsed Doppler, continuous-wave Doppler and color Doppler. In pediatric cardiology, the assessment of sometimes complex anatomy is the major task for the echocardiographer. Using current 2D imaging techniques, an experienced cardiologist can accurately diagnose most congenital malformations. However, 2D imaging has several limitations. Firstly, the quantification of ventricular volumes and function requires geometrical assumptions that are reasonable for normal left ventricles but are often inaccurate for dilated and structurally abnormal hearts. 3D echo could obviate the need for these assumptions, as the entire ventricle can be visualized during the cardiac cycle and ventricular volumes can be measured. The first manuscript on this application of 3D echocardiography was published in 1974 [1]. Secondly the anatomy of congenital heart defects is often so complex that conceptualization of the true "surgical" anatomy out of a series of 2D cut-planes through the heart is often difficult. Transesophageal echo (TEE) can sometimes lead to a better understanding of the intracardiac anatomy due to better image resolution and the possibility of paraplane imaging (cutting through intracardiac structures at different levels) and anyplane imaging (cutting through intracardiac structures at different angles), but it remains essentially a 2D technique. A clear presentation of true anatomy, instead of a conceptualized 3D image in each operator's head, would make discussion about the interpretation of echocardiographic studies more objective. 3D echocardiography allows visualization of 3D relationships instead of having to conceptualize them mentally. These two reasons explain why so much effort was put into developing 3D imaging techniques [2].
History of 3D imaging techniquesIn the early phase of 3D echo, a 3D dataset was created by merging individual 2D cross-sections, obtained at different levels or from different angles [3,4]. The first technique was "freehand scanning:" multiple 2D scanning planes were obtained manually, with the help of an external reference system for the transducer position. The transducer position could be determined with a mechanical arm or with sensors (optical or electrical). In experimental settings the results were promising regarding volumetric data, but the procedure was very time-consuming, suffered from many artifacts and had poor resolution. The second technique used internal reference systems for the acquisition of the cut-planes, and systematic image acquisition was achieved by means of a predetermined transducer motion. This preprogrammed motion of the transducer was linear, fanlike or rotational. It ...