2003
DOI: 10.1016/s1566-1369(03)80019-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Three-dimensional crack growth: Numerical evaluations and experimental tests

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are several approaches to calculate SIFs such as crack tip opening displacement (CTOD) approach, crack tip stress field approach, SIF extraction method from J‐integral, averaged strain energy density (SED) approach, and peak stress method (PSM) . In the present work, the SIFs are extracted from the J ‐integral based on the following equation: J=BE·()KI2+KII2+12G·KIII2, where B = (1 − ν 2 ) for plane strain and 1 for plane stress and G is the tangential modulus of elasticity.…”
Section: Numerical Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are several approaches to calculate SIFs such as crack tip opening displacement (CTOD) approach, crack tip stress field approach, SIF extraction method from J‐integral, averaged strain energy density (SED) approach, and peak stress method (PSM) . In the present work, the SIFs are extracted from the J ‐integral based on the following equation: J=BE·()KI2+KII2+12G·KIII2, where B = (1 − ν 2 ) for plane strain and 1 for plane stress and G is the tangential modulus of elasticity.…”
Section: Numerical Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An automatic crack propagation simulation on the blade is performed by a coupled approach which, starting from the results of a global finite element method (FEM) analysis, proceeds through the sub modelling of the cracked volume in a DBEM dual boundary element method (DBEM) environment and subsequent propagation analysis. displacement (COD) method [8][9][10][11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, the stress analysis on the global model is performed by FEM [1][2][3] whereas the crack propagation phase is simulated by DBEM [4][5][6][7], with the stress intensity factors (SIFs) values along the crack front calculated using the crack opening displacement (COD) method [8][9][10][11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Using the aforementioned relations, the crack front shape and crack growth rate in the depth direction can be predicted. The numerical simulations in [4] are based on the Dual Boundary Element Method [2][3] whereas, in this paper, the same calculations are performed based on the Finite Element Method (FEM). In the past a comparison between FEM and DBEM results on this kind of problems was already attempted but considering separately the two loading conditions [4][5]; now the comparison is extended in case of simultaneous application of the torsion and traction fatigue loads.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%