2015
DOI: 10.1002/2015jd023621
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Three‐dimensional constrained variational analysis: Approach and application to analysis of atmospheric diabatic heating and derivative fields during an ARM SGP intensive observational period

Abstract: Atmospheric vertical velocities and advective tendencies are essential large-scale forcing data to drive single-column models (SCMs), cloud-resolving models (CRMs), and large-eddy simulations (LESs). However, they cannot be directly measured from field measurements or easily calculated with great accuracy. In the Atmospheric Radiation Measurement Program (ARM), a constrained variational algorithm (1-D constrained variational analysis (1DCVA)) has been used to derive large-scale forcing data over a sounding net… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
30
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
(68 reference statements)
1
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The upper-level heating and drying, lowerlevel cooling and moistening indicate that there are precipitating stratiform clouds in the upper level and evaporation of precipitation underneath. The negative Q 1 − Q 2 − Q rad in the lower level and the positive Q 1 − Q 2 − Q rad in the upper level are seen in both the COS and BOS case, which indicates lower-level divergence of h and upper-level convergence of h due to moist convective processes, consistent with Tang and Zhang (2015). The lower-level positive Q 1 −Q 2 −Q rad in the afternoon is mainly contributed by the vertical convergence of moisture by sub-grid eddies, similar to that in the LOS case.…”
Section: Cos (20 -21 February 2014)supporting
confidence: 63%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The upper-level heating and drying, lowerlevel cooling and moistening indicate that there are precipitating stratiform clouds in the upper level and evaporation of precipitation underneath. The negative Q 1 − Q 2 − Q rad in the lower level and the positive Q 1 − Q 2 − Q rad in the upper level are seen in both the COS and BOS case, which indicates lower-level divergence of h and upper-level convergence of h due to moist convective processes, consistent with Tang and Zhang (2015). The lower-level positive Q 1 −Q 2 −Q rad in the afternoon is mainly contributed by the vertical convergence of moisture by sub-grid eddies, similar to that in the LOS case.…”
Section: Cos (20 -21 February 2014)supporting
confidence: 63%
“…This local circulation and the horizontal inhomogeneity of largescale vertical velocity, heating and moistening could be better studied using high-resolution 3-D gridded large-scale forcing data from the 3-D constrained variational analysis recently developed by Tang and Zhang (2015) and Tang et al (2016). This will be the subject of a future study.…”
Section: Summary and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ability to separate the physics parameterization schemes from the dynamics is very useful, as most stochastic schemes assume that model error is due only to the parameterized physics. The usefulness of SCM forcing data that includes an estimate of subgrid variability has been demonstrated by Tang and Zhang () and Tang et al (), who consider subgrid variability in forcing fields derived from measurements at the Atmospheric Radiation Measurement Southern Great Plains site. In particular, they highlight the utility of such data sets for deriving and evaluating scale‐aware parameterization schemes, since the SCM forcing files can be specified across a range of resolutions (Tang et al, ).…”
Section: Discussion and Concluding Remarksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…New sophisticated methods have been developed to reduce errors in the large‐scale forcing (Zhang & Lin, ; Zhang et al, ), though the accuracy of the data can be limited by missing data and scale aliasing in the measurements. In addition, recent advances have seen the development of a three‐dimensional constrained variational analysis approach (Tang & Zhang, ), which enables the estimation of fine‐resolution SCM forcing data sets from observational data. The new technique enables the estimation of atmospheric profiles for a number of adjacent columns around suitable observational sites.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As described in Tang and Zhang [], the 3DCVA follows the general idea of 1DCVA [ Zhang and Lin , ] that the atmospheric state variables (referred to as background data hereafter) u , v , q , and s are adjusted to minimize the cost function: I=uuoTBuprefix−1()uuo+vvoTBvprefix−1()vvo+()qqo+ssoTBsprefix−1()sso, while maintaining the column‐integrated conservation of mass, moisture, and energy simultaneously across all spatial grids in the analysis domain: ⟨⟩V=prefix−1gnormaldPsnormaldt ⟨⟩qt+⟨⟩Vtrue→q=EsPnormalrnormalenormalc⟨⟩qlt ⟨⟩st+⟨⟩Vs=RnormalTnormalOnormalARnormalSnormalFnormalC+LvPnormalrnormalenormalc+SH+Lv⟨⟩qlt. …”
Section: Methods and Data Of Ensemble 3dcvamentioning
confidence: 99%