2017
DOI: 10.1039/c6nr06465e
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Three-dimensional conductive networks based on stacked SiO2@graphene frameworks for enhanced gas sensing

Abstract: Graphene is an ideal candidate for gas sensing due to its excellent conductivity and large specific surface areas. However, it usually suffers from sheet stacking, which seriously debilitates its sensing performance. Herein, we demonstrate a three-dimensional conductive network based on stacked SiO@graphene core-shell hybrid frameworks for enhanced gas sensing. SiO spheres are uniformly encapsulated by graphene oxide (GO) through an electrostatic self-assembly approach to form SiO@GO core-shell hybrid framewor… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
62
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 119 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
1
62
0
Order By: Relevance
“…10). However, the chemisorption of oxygen on Co 3 O 4 creates the hole accumulation layer on the surface of Co 3 O 4 , different from that of n-type semiconductor [46][47][48], where the electron depletion layer is created at the grain boundaries. In general, the atmospheric oxygen is adsorbed in ionic forms at the surface as O 2 − (<100°C), O − (100-300°C) and O 2− (>300°C) in the air [49].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10). However, the chemisorption of oxygen on Co 3 O 4 creates the hole accumulation layer on the surface of Co 3 O 4 , different from that of n-type semiconductor [46][47][48], where the electron depletion layer is created at the grain boundaries. In general, the atmospheric oxygen is adsorbed in ionic forms at the surface as O 2 − (<100°C), O − (100-300°C) and O 2− (>300°C) in the air [49].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to demonstrate the sensing capability of the GSV‐WO 3–δ flexible sensing device, we measured its resistance change under exposure to analyte gases. The response factor is defined as R = Δ R/R 0 = ( R g − R 0 )/ R 0 , where R g and R 0 represent resistance of the sensor to be exposed (respectively) to analytic gas and N 2 . As shown in Figure c, the resistance of the device exposed to NO 2 gas was strongly dependent on the operating temperature.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most importantly, the response/recovery time for oxidizing NO 2 gas (17/25 s), as depicted in Figure b, was fast enough for practical applications. The long recovery time after exposure to reducing gas might be due to a complex sensing mechanism that slows down the desorption rate of the detected gas . Meanwhile, specific response factors to the gases of the GSV‐WO 3–δ sensor device were compared in Figure c.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From 100˚C to 300˚C, the TGA curve declines slowly because of the decomposition of a small amount of oxygen containing functional groups of graphene [15].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%