2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2012.04.029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Three-dimensional cohesive crack model prediction of the flexural capacity of concrete slabs on soil

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
22
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
2
22
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In all the cases of volumetric slab models, the difference of the results of the FEM with respect to the PCA method are less than 2.9% while in the shell models the difference are less than 10.03%. These errors were concordant with those obtained by Gaedicke et al (2012), who obtained a difference of 1%-5% between the simulated and experimental peak load capacity considering 150 mm depth slabs.…”
Section: Application Of the Fem For Sizing Concrete Slabs For Forkliftsupporting
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In all the cases of volumetric slab models, the difference of the results of the FEM with respect to the PCA method are less than 2.9% while in the shell models the difference are less than 10.03%. These errors were concordant with those obtained by Gaedicke et al (2012), who obtained a difference of 1%-5% between the simulated and experimental peak load capacity considering 150 mm depth slabs.…”
Section: Application Of the Fem For Sizing Concrete Slabs For Forkliftsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…5b shows the bending stresses in the section of the slab considering the load case 5. The evolution of the bending stresses is concordant with that obtained by Ferrer et al (2000) and Gaedicke et al (2012) considering loads on concrete slabs over ground.…”
Section: Application Of the Fem For Sizing Concrete Slabs For Agriculsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…Although these elements were two-dimensional, responses obtained were compared with experimental measurements and adequately good agreement was reported. Subsequently several independent investigations of crack propagation in beams and slabs on grade subjected to mechanical loads was carried out, with some very encouraging results [46,47,48,49]. Gaedicke and Roesler [46] found that the linear softening model applied to slabs was able to reasonably predict the flexural load capacity of the experimental slabs while significantly reducing the computation time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The principles of the fictitious crack model have been extended to practical problems for concrete-and composite pavement structures applying cohesive interface elements or contact for-mulations, with some very encouraging results (Meda et al 2004;Ioannides et al 2006;Gaedicke and Roesler 2009;Gaedicke et al 2012;Aure and Ioannides 2012;Evangelista et al 2013;Aure and Ioannides 2015;Skar and Poulsen 2015). Gaedicke and Roesler (2009) and Gaedicke et al (2012), who published one of the few simulations with experimental results, used the interface element with tabular traction-displacement relation featured by ABAQUS (2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gaedicke and Roesler (2009) and Gaedicke et al (2012), who published one of the few simulations with experimental results, used the interface element with tabular traction-displacement relation featured by ABAQUS (2013). The authors reported lack of convergence, instability problems, snap-backs, and aborted simulations upon local unloading and reloading paths.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%