2009
DOI: 10.1021/jp8104024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Three-Dimensional Chirality Transfer in Rubrene Multilayer Islands on Au(111)

Abstract: The growth of rubrene (C(42)H(28), 5,6,11,12-tetraphenylnaphthacene) multilayer islands up to a thickness of six layers on a Au(111) surface has been investigated by scanning tunneling microscopy. The molecules self-organize in parallel twin rows, forming mirror domains of defined local structural chirality. Each layer is composed of twin-row domains of the same structural handedness rotated by 120 degrees with respect to each other. Moreover, this structural chirality is transferred to all successive layers i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
27
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The fact that each domain was rotated a small angle from the substrate’s high symmetry axis rendered them chiral 4. 5c, 7a, 9b, 26 Each tri‐lobe structure consisted exclusively of either clockwise‐ or counterclockwise‐rotated domains, but never a mixture of the two, indicating that the self‐assembly was enantiospecific. As each tri‐lobe unit is homochiral, we use “+” and “−” chirality labels, indicating either a +14° or −14° rotation from the high‐symmetry directions of the Cu(111) substrate (determined within <1° error, see Experimental Section), in order to signify the chirality of each distinct tri‐lobe unit as shown in the subsequent figures.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fact that each domain was rotated a small angle from the substrate’s high symmetry axis rendered them chiral 4. 5c, 7a, 9b, 26 Each tri‐lobe structure consisted exclusively of either clockwise‐ or counterclockwise‐rotated domains, but never a mixture of the two, indicating that the self‐assembly was enantiospecific. As each tri‐lobe unit is homochiral, we use “+” and “−” chirality labels, indicating either a +14° or −14° rotation from the high‐symmetry directions of the Cu(111) substrate (determined within <1° error, see Experimental Section), in order to signify the chirality of each distinct tri‐lobe unit as shown in the subsequent figures.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[17] Some aspects of the self-assembly in two [18,19] and three [20] dimensions, of twodimensional tiling, [21] and of the electronic properties [22,23] of rubrene on Au(111) have already been reported. Here the focus lies on the coverage-dependent assembly of rubrene on gold (111) and (100) as well as silver (111) and (100) surfaces with the aim to elucidate the influence of the electronic and geometric structure of the surface on the self-assembly process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, P enantiomers are in the second layer of the λ domains (λ 2nd ), and M enantiomers are in the second layer of the ρ domains (ρ 2nd ). This structure is in contrast to the multilayer structure of chiral rubrene, for which racemic mirror domains were reported for the top layer 29…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%