2017
DOI: 10.1177/0954410017716195
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Three-dimensional characterization of passive flow control devices over an aircraft carrier ski-jump ramp

Abstract: The aircraft carrier is a key element in modern navies. On-board operations at sea take place under very severe conditions, which affect the aerodynamic flow on the flight deck. The ski-jump ramp is a curved runway that enables the aircraft to takeoff using shorter runway distance. However, this geometry generates strong flow disturbances, mainly characterized by a recirculation bubble at the forward end of the ramp. This phenomenon reduces the aircraft performances and increases the pilot's workload due to th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
(19 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…16 Other studies have focused on improving the flow in the bow region of the aircraft carrier by fitting passive devices such as CVGs, bow flaps, and cylindrical sections. [17][18][19][20] Except for the studies carried out by Cherry and Constantino, 2 where they had compared the island configurations of the Nimitz and Ford class, there have been no studies carried out so far, at least in the open domain, on the effect of changes to the island configuration on the external aerodynamics of an aircraft carrier, especially the burble behind the carrier. This paper aims to fill the gap by carrying out parametric investigations on various configurations of the island structure and its effect on the burble behind the carrier.…”
Section: Literature Surveymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…16 Other studies have focused on improving the flow in the bow region of the aircraft carrier by fitting passive devices such as CVGs, bow flaps, and cylindrical sections. [17][18][19][20] Except for the studies carried out by Cherry and Constantino, 2 where they had compared the island configurations of the Nimitz and Ford class, there have been no studies carried out so far, at least in the open domain, on the effect of changes to the island configuration on the external aerodynamics of an aircraft carrier, especially the burble behind the carrier. This paper aims to fill the gap by carrying out parametric investigations on various configurations of the island structure and its effect on the burble behind the carrier.…”
Section: Literature Surveymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Czerwiec 67 LHA Bow-flap Shafer 64 DDG-81 Porous surfaces, different fence, and blowing Landman 68 LHD Flap and columnar vortex generator (CVG) Findlay 69 DDG-81 Eleven different configurations of fences Greenwell 70 SFS Eight different configurations of inclined screen Kääriä 71 SRF Different side-flap configurations and hangar notch Forrest 65,66 SFS2 Five different modifications including chamfer, flap, tabs, saw-tooth, and cylinder Kääriä 72 SRF Side-flap and hangar notch Kääriä 1 SRF Six windward hangar side-face modifications Mora 73 SFS Four configurations with different hangar roof curvature Mora 74 SFS Active plasma flow control technique with two configurations Bardera 75 Aircraft carrier Cylinder, triangular-notched fence and CVG Bardera 76 Aircraft carrier Different configurations of flat plate, cylinder, and CVG Bardera 77 Aircraft carrier CVG with two angles Matias 78 SFS2 Trapezoidal vortex generator, suction, and blowing Bardera 79 Aircraft carrier CVGs with five spiral parameters one rotor diameter. For medium-weight helicopters, it is usually around 30 m. The NORSTOCK Standard C-004 for the offshore helicopter 83 puts forward the similar requirements to CAP 437.…”
Section: Authors Ship Modificationsmentioning
confidence: 99%