2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.actaastro.2015.06.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Three dimensional CFD investigation of shock train structure in a supersonic nozzle

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such supersonic duct flows have been studied using both experimental and computational [22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37] approaches. The experimental studies have mainly used pressure measurements, laser Doppler velocimetry, and schlieren images to reconstruct the shocktrain structure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Such supersonic duct flows have been studied using both experimental and computational [22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37] approaches. The experimental studies have mainly used pressure measurements, laser Doppler velocimetry, and schlieren images to reconstruct the shocktrain structure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second kind of isolator simulations involves a normal shock train [25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33], which is more relevant to the dual-mode scramjet regime. Here, the initial shock bifurcation is caused by flow confinement, which requires either a numerical backpressure condition at the outlet or the inclusion of the combustor in the computation domain.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Chung et al [10] used naphthalene sublimation method to investigate the flow field behavior, vortex formation and heat transfer near the nozzle end wall using CFD simulations and experiments. The work is carried on to investigate the wall pressure, flow separation, shock wave propagation and boundary layer transient flows through 3-D planar, supersonic convergent-divergent and Laval nozzle using different sub-grid models (WALE, WMLES, and Smagorinsky-Lilly) and proposed that WMLES provide best results using LES and validate it with experimental results [11][12][13]. The work was continued to predict the high pressure (70 MPa) hydrogen fluid flow behavior and its boundary layer pattern and concluded that fluid throat was generated due to viscous effects which acts as a convergent-divergent nozzle [14].…”
Section: Introduction mentioning
confidence: 99%