2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2016.06.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Three-dimensional autologous cartilage framework fabrication assisted by new additive manufactured ear-shaped templates for microtia reconstruction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
33
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
(15 reference statements)
0
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A previous study has demonstrated minimal differences in the screenshots of specimen surfaces obtained using a CT scan and an Artec Space Spider scanner (19). Blue light 3D scanning technology used in the Artec Spider does not emit radiation during the scanning process and is therefore harmless to patients (20).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A previous study has demonstrated minimal differences in the screenshots of specimen surfaces obtained using a CT scan and an Artec Space Spider scanner (19). Blue light 3D scanning technology used in the Artec Spider does not emit radiation during the scanning process and is therefore harmless to patients (20).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some diagnosis of ear deformations such as the prominent ear is dependent on cranioauricular angles (7). In addition, CH and CA are the key indices in diagnosing microtia (20). The ALA is becoming a very promising index in the diagnosis of constricted ear and other abnormalities which are associated with substantial helix changes (29).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this approach has several limitations; first of all, the X-ray film-based acquisition is affected by an error due to the pressure that is exerted on the ear while the silhouette is traced. Such a pressure, in fact, causes a deformation of the external ear, thus leading to an inaccurate drawing of the structure [63]. Furthermore, the 2D template does not convey the necessary information about the three-dimensional geometry of the ear, i.e., height, thickness, depth features of the anatomical elements of the ear structure (helix, antihelix, tragus–antitragus, concha, and scapha [64]).…”
Section: Methods To Simulate Ear Reconstructionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zhou et al [63] used a 3D scanner (Artec Spider, Artec Group, 11,000 €) with a resolution of 0.1 mm to obtain the auricular structure of 40 subjects affected by microtia. Data were processed using a Reverse Engineering CAD software (Geomagic Studio, 3D Systems, Rock Hill, SC, USA) and two different templates of the affected ear were designed and printed: a 2D sheet ear-shaped mold and a 3D template.…”
Section: Methods To Simulate Ear Reconstructionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In most studies [4][5][6][7], the data from a patient's tomographic examination are used to create digital models. In [8][9][10], the photogrammetry method was applied to transform photographic images into a three-dimensional model. The analysis of the research shows that to create the most complete anatomical shape of the ear, especially with an internal structure, it is preferable to use the graphical data of the patient's tomographic examination.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%