2022
DOI: 10.1002/admi.202201189
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Three‐Dimensional Atomic‐Scale Tomography of Buried Semiconductor Heterointerfaces

Abstract: yields two-dimensional projections and hence does not resolve the third dimension of the interface.Atom probe tomography (APT) with its capability of imaging the local chemistry in three-dimensions at the near atomic scale is a prime candidate for achieving atomic-scale characterization of buried interfaces. [12][13][14][15] However, limitations arising from the comparatively simple algorithms to reconstruct APT data are known to cause significant aberrations near interfaces, limiting accuracy. [12,[16][17][18… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 39 publications
(117 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1b, c, and diffuse alloy disorder essentially ruling out abrupt stepped interfaces. Reported interface widths span 0.7-1.0 ± 0.3 nm, i.e., several atomic layers, with alloy number fluctuations adding variability 28,49,50 . Hence, recent theory, simulation, and experiment focus primarily on VS variability owing to random alloy disorder and alloy fluctuations 23,25,28,51 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1b, c, and diffuse alloy disorder essentially ruling out abrupt stepped interfaces. Reported interface widths span 0.7-1.0 ± 0.3 nm, i.e., several atomic layers, with alloy number fluctuations adding variability 28,49,50 . Hence, recent theory, simulation, and experiment focus primarily on VS variability owing to random alloy disorder and alloy fluctuations 23,25,28,51 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%