2018
DOI: 10.15171/jpid.2016.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Three-dimensional Assessment of the Nasopalatine Canal and the Surrounding Bone Using Cone-beam Computed Tomography

Abstract: Background and aims. Because of increasing concerns about surgeries in the anterior maxilla, including implant placement, it is necessary to examine the morphology of the nasopalatine canal and its surrounding bones. This study aimed to analyze the shape and position of the nasopalatine canal and incisive foramen using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). Materials and methods. CBCT images of 110 patients referred to Hamadan School of Dentistry were examined. The size and shape of the nasopalatine canal and i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

8
17
3
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
8
17
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In the present study, the anteroposterior diameter of the incisive foramen was measured as 4.79±1.26 mm, and the mediolateral diameter was measured as 3.29±1.09 mm. This is similar to the results of a study by Salemi et al [19] in that the incisive foramen was found to be ovalshaped, with a larger anteroposterior than mediolateral diameter. In addition, the diameters https://doi.org/10.5051/jpis.2020.50.1.48…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…In the present study, the anteroposterior diameter of the incisive foramen was measured as 4.79±1.26 mm, and the mediolateral diameter was measured as 3.29±1.09 mm. This is similar to the results of a study by Salemi et al [19] in that the incisive foramen was found to be ovalshaped, with a larger anteroposterior than mediolateral diameter. In addition, the diameters https://doi.org/10.5051/jpis.2020.50.1.48…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The mean length of nasopalatine canal in the present study was higher than that reported by some earlier research by Nasseh et al On contrary, the nasopalatine canal length in the present study was similar to that reported in two studies by Kajan et al (2015); Salemi et al (2016). [3,12] In the present study, the length of nasopalatine canal was shorter in females than in males but it was not statistically significant. On the other hand, few researchers: Kajan et al (2015); Tozum et al (2012); Nasseh et al (2017) reported that the length of nasopalatine canal was 1,12,13 significantly higher in males than females.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 76%
“…Khojastepour et al showed statistically significant differences in the length of the incisive canal between males and females where the mean lengths of the canals were 11.46 mm and 9.37 mm, respectively. Although limited by a small sample, the previously mentioned Lebanese study found that the length of the canal was shorter in females [ 3 , 21 - 23 ]. Additionally, the length of the canal also varies based on the height of the maxillary bone [ 22 ].…”
Section: Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CBCT studies have demonstrated that maxillary tooth loss markedly reduces buccal bone plate thickness. Interestingly, this finding has been used to explain, with statistical significance, why the incisive canal’s width is positively correlated and its length negatively correlated with tooth loss/extraction and the aging of dentulous maxillae [ 3 , 13 , 15 , 20 , 24 ]. Khohastepur et al also pinpointed gender variances reporting that the alveolar bone thickness is higher in men than in women [ 20 ].…”
Section: Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation