2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2010.02.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Three-dimensional ankle kinematics and kinetics during running in women

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
6
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Because the eggbeater kick does not have a support phase during its cycle, and it relies strongly on the orientation of the feet to create propulsive forces, one might expect large amplitude and ranges of motions for the ankle joint. Ankle maximum plantarflexion, inversion and adduction during the eggbeater kick were greater than the values reported for daily activities, such as walking 23 , or sports movements such as running 24,21 or cycling 22 .…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 61%
“…Because the eggbeater kick does not have a support phase during its cycle, and it relies strongly on the orientation of the feet to create propulsive forces, one might expect large amplitude and ranges of motions for the ankle joint. Ankle maximum plantarflexion, inversion and adduction during the eggbeater kick were greater than the values reported for daily activities, such as walking 23 , or sports movements such as running 24,21 or cycling 22 .…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 61%
“…A modified Helen-Hayes marker set was used for testing. This marker set has been previously used when testing patients with ankle [12][13][14][15], hip [16][17][18][19], and knee OA [20,21], as well as healthy control subjects [22]. Each subject was asked to stand within the capture volume to record a static standing trial.…”
Section: Experimental Design and Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A landing maneuver of medially directed GRF usually promotes hip adduction and knee and ankle abduction to absorb the impact 23) . These findings of differences between males and females may be explained by different strengths of ligaments and muscles possibly, arising from hormonal differences, lower initial fitness, and anthropometric factors 24) . It has also been reported that there are gender differences in the neuromuscular responses of the quadriceps and hamstring, the quadriceps activation in females being earlier and rising more rapidly than the hamstring at relatively small knee flexion angles 25) .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%