2020
DOI: 10.1097/dss.0000000000002399
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Three-Dimensional Analysis of Age-Related Orbital and Midfacial Bone Remodeling in Asians

Abstract: BACKGROUND Facial bony changes vary among races, yet few studies have been conducted in Asians. OBJECTIVE To analyze the aging of orbital and midfacial bones in Asians. METHODS Based on the two-dimensional data obtained from the computed tomography scanner of imaging department, 3D reconstructions were conducted to take measurements (orbital diagonal diameter, orbital width, orbital area, maxillary angle, mi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Those results are consistent with the data obtained for modern populations 27,41−46 . Although it should be noted, that some authors failed to show signi cant changes with age in orbital parameters 28,47 or even suggested a decrease in some orbital dimensions 26,48,49 . According to Karunanayake 26 those contradictions arise from varying location of the measurements among researchers, which can be an important factor considering that resorption in orbital area is not homogeneous.…”
Section: Orbitsmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Those results are consistent with the data obtained for modern populations 27,41−46 . Although it should be noted, that some authors failed to show signi cant changes with age in orbital parameters 28,47 or even suggested a decrease in some orbital dimensions 26,48,49 . According to Karunanayake 26 those contradictions arise from varying location of the measurements among researchers, which can be an important factor considering that resorption in orbital area is not homogeneous.…”
Section: Orbitsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…However, left and right side measurements in each age category showed no differences, so it cannot be con rmed. For modern populations some authors reported that midfacial height increases with age [53][54][55] others showed that aging changes result in maxillary parameters reduction 23,26,49 . However, those studies differ in applied methodology from our study, and thus they cannot be directly compared.…”
Section: Maxillamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Those results are consistent with the data obtained for modern populations 28,[47][48][49][50][51][52] . Although it should be noted that some authors failed to show significant changes with age in orbital parameters 29,53 or even suggested a decrease in some orbital dimensions 27,54,55 . According to Karunanayake 27 those contradictions arise from varying location of the measurements among researchers, which can be an important factor considering that resorption in orbital area is not homogeneous.…”
Section: Craniofacial Skeletal Changes With Agementioning
confidence: 98%
“…For modern populations, some authors reported that midfacial height increases with age [59][60][61] . Others showed that aging changes result in a reduction of maxillary parameters 24,27,55 . However, those studies differ in applied methodology from our study, and thus they cannot be directly compared.…”
Section: Maxillamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Classic morphometric studies highlight considerable variation in these measurements, which can be explained by intra‐ and inter‐population variability (Feng et al, 2020; Kim et al, 2020; Moon et al, 2020; Pessa et al, 1999). However, variation can also be explained to a significant extent by methodological differences in orbit measurements (Sentucq et al, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%