2022
DOI: 10.3390/axioms11100525
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Three Decades of Fuzzy AHP: A Bibliometric Analysis

Abstract: For decades, Fuzzy Sets Theory (FST) has been consistently developed, and its use has spread across multiple disciplines. In this process of knowledge transfer, fuzzy applications have experienced great diffusion. Among them, Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (fuzzy AHP) is one of the most widely used methodologies today. This study performs a systematic review following the PRISMA statement and addresses a bibliometric analysis of all articles published on fuzzy AHP in journals indexed in Web of Science, speci… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 161 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Given its ability to capture the multidimensional nature of decision-making problems as well as the possibility to deal with quantitative and qualitative criteria while ensuring the stakeholder centrality in the evaluation process, AHP has been widely applied to help decision-makers in sustainability decisions (Diaz-Balteiro et al, 2017;Kwatra et al, 2021;Tošovi c-Stevanovi c et al, 2020). To handle the intrinsic vagueness inherent in the subjective evaluations that characterize sustainability evaluations, AHP is commonly integrated with fuzzy logic (Castell o-Sirvent et al, 2022). However, considering that AHP, as well as the fuzzy extension, requires a very large number of pairwise comparisons when the number of items to be compared increases, the use of fuzzy ARAS as a continuation of fuzzy AHP has been successfully applied to minimize the need to collect experts' judgments and better deal with subjectivity (Nguyen et al, 2016).…”
Section: The Integrated Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given its ability to capture the multidimensional nature of decision-making problems as well as the possibility to deal with quantitative and qualitative criteria while ensuring the stakeholder centrality in the evaluation process, AHP has been widely applied to help decision-makers in sustainability decisions (Diaz-Balteiro et al, 2017;Kwatra et al, 2021;Tošovi c-Stevanovi c et al, 2020). To handle the intrinsic vagueness inherent in the subjective evaluations that characterize sustainability evaluations, AHP is commonly integrated with fuzzy logic (Castell o-Sirvent et al, 2022). However, considering that AHP, as well as the fuzzy extension, requires a very large number of pairwise comparisons when the number of items to be compared increases, the use of fuzzy ARAS as a continuation of fuzzy AHP has been successfully applied to minimize the need to collect experts' judgments and better deal with subjectivity (Nguyen et al, 2016).…”
Section: The Integrated Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%