2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmathb.2022.100955
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Three cases that demonstrate how students connect the domains of mathematics and computing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
(36 reference statements)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Different than K-12 mathematics teaching that often rely on paper-and-pencil, it is not uncommon to find an undergraduate mathematics class that includes CT components. However, despite the predominate CT-math integration at the collegiate level, there has been few research that provides fine-grained analysis of the interplay between CT and mathematics learning, although recent work by Lockwood, Sand, and colleagues have paid explicit attention to this research line (Lockwood, 2022;Lockwood & De Chenne, 2020, 2021Sand et al, 2022). In addition, more interestingly, these scholars' findings echo the types of interplay we have identified in the current review, and future research can continue to gain insights into how the interactions between CT and mathematical thinking may manifest differently or similarly in both contexts (Lockwood & Mørken, 2021;Lockwood, et al, 2019).…”
Section: Discussion and Future Research Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different than K-12 mathematics teaching that often rely on paper-and-pencil, it is not uncommon to find an undergraduate mathematics class that includes CT components. However, despite the predominate CT-math integration at the collegiate level, there has been few research that provides fine-grained analysis of the interplay between CT and mathematics learning, although recent work by Lockwood, Sand, and colleagues have paid explicit attention to this research line (Lockwood, 2022;Lockwood & De Chenne, 2020, 2021Sand et al, 2022). In addition, more interestingly, these scholars' findings echo the types of interplay we have identified in the current review, and future research can continue to gain insights into how the interactions between CT and mathematical thinking may manifest differently or similarly in both contexts (Lockwood & Mørken, 2021;Lockwood, et al, 2019).…”
Section: Discussion and Future Research Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When both the mathematics and the chemical system are described as evolving with time, it might also be easier for students to understand the connections between the mathematical model and the chemical system it represents, which previous research has regarded as problematic for many students. 12,17,[23][24][25]28 Bain et al state that we can help students view mathematical expressions as less abstract by making the connection between the mathematical model and what it represents explicit. 8 Their findings suggest that this can be done by making theoretical connections explicit or by partaking in laboratory work.…”
Section: ■ Conclusion and Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One way students can connect the mathematical domain with the chemistry domain is by using programming and computation . Computers present a different way of representing and thinking about both chemistry and mathematics, and this may affect how students think about certain problems and concepts in these subjects. , …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations