2018
DOI: 10.1088/1873-7005/aa769c
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Three branches of dynamo action

Abstract: Abstract.In addition to the weak-dipolar state and to the fluctuating-multipolar state, widely discussed in the literature, a third regime has been identified in (Dormy 2016). It corresponds to a strong-dipolar branch which appears to approach, in a numerically affordable regime, the magnetostrophic limit relevant to the dynamics of the Earth's core. We discuss the transitions between these states and point to the relevance to this strong-dipolar state to Geodynamo modelling.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
26
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
1
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For a series of dynamos, Dormy et al (2018) calculated the vorticity length scale 2 ω = u 2 / ω 2 (introduced in Oruba & Dormy 2014), where the angle brackets denote time and volume averages. For the helical columnar convection exhibited in these simulations, Figure 20.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For a series of dynamos, Dormy et al (2018) calculated the vorticity length scale 2 ω = u 2 / ω 2 (introduced in Oruba & Dormy 2014), where the angle brackets denote time and volume averages. For the helical columnar convection exhibited in these simulations, Figure 20.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the helical columnar convection exhibited in these simulations, Figure 20. The vorticity length scale ω plotted against n for a dataset from Dormy et al (2018). The shaded region is bounded by the lines n = 4 ω and n = 6 ω , and the dashed black line is n = 5 ω .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Since increasing Pm not only increases Rm but also decreases E λ , figure 5 suggests that this offers an alternative (and certainly numerically cheaper) path to more Earth-like simulations. Dormy (2016) and Dormy et al (2018) report that a third dynamo branch can indeed be found when increasing the magnetic Prandtl number at low Rayleigh numbers. This branch is characterised by a particularly strong dipole-dominated magnetic field.…”
Section: Towards Earth-like Solutionsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…One reason is that ⊥ spans little more than one order of magnitude in typical current dynamo simulations. Another reason is that the results can depend on the specific method used for estimating ⊥ (Dormy et al 2018). When using, for example, equation 36, the additional small scales that are excited at smaller Ekman numbers could already decrease the ⊥ estimate, even when the dominant flow scale remains unchanged.…”
Section: The Mac Balancementioning
confidence: 99%