1997
DOI: 10.1063/1.474923
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Three-body distribution functions in hard sphere fluids. Comparison of excluded-volume-anisotropy model predictions and Monte Carlo simulation

Abstract: Hard sphere three-body distribution functions predicted by the recently developed Excluded-Volume-Anisotropy (EVA) model are compared with Monte Carlo computer simulation measurements. Two types of simulations, both based on the Widom insertion method, are performed as a function of solvent density (0.1⩽ρσ3⩽0.8), solute structure (linear, triangular, and bent 3-bead chain), and solute–solvent sphere diameter ratio (0⩽σ/σS⩽3). Comparisons of these results with those of previous studies illustrate the accuracy o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…36 The sensitivity of the PHF model to solute anisotropy ͑⌬͒ comes from the fact that the chemical potential of each solute depends on anisotropy ͑as dictated by the EVA model and confirmed by Monte Carlo simulation results͒. 28,29,36 In retrospect, it should not be surprising that the best fit anisotropy values are not exactly the same as those derived for the excluded volumes and areas of the solutes ͑see Appendix and Table II͒. This is because the EVA model is only strictly intended to model cavity formation energies for solute molecules dissolved in hard sphere fluids.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…36 The sensitivity of the PHF model to solute anisotropy ͑⌬͒ comes from the fact that the chemical potential of each solute depends on anisotropy ͑as dictated by the EVA model and confirmed by Monte Carlo simulation results͒. 28,29,36 In retrospect, it should not be surprising that the best fit anisotropy values are not exactly the same as those derived for the excluded volumes and areas of the solutes ͑see Appendix and Table II͒. This is because the EVA model is only strictly intended to model cavity formation energies for solute molecules dissolved in hard sphere fluids.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…28,29 The present work, and previous solvation free energy calculations, 10 illustrate applications of the EVA model to molecular liquid thermodynamic calculations. In order to perform such calculations reliably, it is very important to choose an appropriate effective hard sphere diameter for the solvent.…”
Section: The Excluded Volume Anisotropy Modelmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…We validated the proposed stepwise insertion Monte Carlo method through the calculation of residual chemical potentials of highly dilute trimers in spheres. The trimers are composed of identical spheres whose centers form an equilateral triangle with side length equal to one spherical diameter, so that we could reproduce the results of Ben-Amotz et al (1997). The simulation box contained 256 spheres and the diameter ratio d 1 = σ 1 /σ S varied from 0.1 to 0.9 at the reduced densities of 0.1, 0.5, and 0.8.…”
Section: Validation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Results are presented in Figure 6 and were compared with those of Ben-Amotz et al (1997), who calculated the chemical potential with two different methodologies, both based on the Widom insertion method. One can observe an increase of residual chemical potential with the increase of the diameter ratio.…”
Section: Validation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, an assessment of the triplet correlation is our second purpose. Some molecular simulations have been used to obtain triplet distribution functions for a hard-sphere fluid [19][20][21][22][23]. However, the results are not adequate for our study, because we wish to examine the distribution function of a system that has the same packing fraction as water.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%