2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2013.06.035
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Three-arm randomised controlled phase 2 study comparing pemetrexed and erlotinib to either pemetrexed or erlotinib alone as second-line treatment for never-smokers with non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
97
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(100 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
97
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The overall response rate was significantly higher for gefitinib (30.1% vs. 14.9%, p < 0.001) 96 . Progression-free survival was significantly longer for patients randomized to gefitinib (9.4 months vs. 2.9 months, p = 0.010) and also for patients randomized to a combination of erlotinib and pemetrexed (7.4 months vs. 3.8 months for erlotinib and 4.4 months for pemetrexed alone; hr: 0.57; 95% ci: 0.40 to 0.81; p = 0.002) 97 . However, the survival rates were nonsignificantly different (p = 0.89) 96,97 .…”
Section: Clinically Selected Populations: Egfr Inhibitor Compared Witmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The overall response rate was significantly higher for gefitinib (30.1% vs. 14.9%, p < 0.001) 96 . Progression-free survival was significantly longer for patients randomized to gefitinib (9.4 months vs. 2.9 months, p = 0.010) and also for patients randomized to a combination of erlotinib and pemetrexed (7.4 months vs. 3.8 months for erlotinib and 4.4 months for pemetrexed alone; hr: 0.57; 95% ci: 0.40 to 0.81; p = 0.002) 97 . However, the survival rates were nonsignificantly different (p = 0.89) 96,97 .…”
Section: Clinically Selected Populations: Egfr Inhibitor Compared Witmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study by Lee et al demonstrated that PFS, the primary endpoint, was improved by combination of erlotinib with pemetrexed in never-smokers with advanced NSCLC, but no statistically significant difference was found in OS, the secondary endpoint, between pemetrexed plus erlotinib and either single agent. The benefit was observed across multiple clinical and biomarker subgroups [29] . In the single arm study by Sangha on combination of intermittent erlotinib with tri-weekly docetaxel, the RR (28.1%) met the expected value (20%).…”
Section: Phase II Studies Of Combination Of Erlotinib With Pemetrexedmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…There are four phase II studies of combination of erlotinib with a cytotoxic agent; three pemetrexed studies [28][29][30][31] and one docetaxel study [24] ( Table 2).…”
Section: Phase II Studies Of Combination Of Erlotinib With Pemetrexedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mean PFS was 16.8 months (11). In the second-line setting, pemetrexed (day 1) plus intercalated erlotinib (day 2-14 of a 21-day cycle) could improve its PFS in non-smoking and nonsquamous cell carcinoma patients compared with either erlotinib or pemetrexed alone (12). In the randomized phase II trial of erlotinib alone or with carboplatin and paclitaxel (up to six cycles), the addition of chemotherapy could not prolong PFS (5.0 vs. 6.6 months, P=0.1988) in patients who were never or light former smoker with advanced lung adenocarcinoma (CALGB 30406 trial) (13).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So the enhancement of cytotoxicity when pemetrexed is added to gefitinib might suppress the small subpopulation of cells harboring T790M mutation or with the mesenchymal phenotype. Preclinical studies indicated there is cell cycle dependent synergism or antagonism when combining chemotherapy and EGFR TKI, however clinical data do not support it well (10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%