Three- and 4-year-old children’s response tendencies to various interviewers

Okanda, Mako; Kanda, Takayuki; Ishiguro, Hiroshi; Itakura, Shoji

doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2013.03.012

Cited by 18 publications

(46 citation statements)

References 20 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…These results suggest that Japanese children are able to say "no," but they are likely to choose "yes" when an unfamiliar interviewer tries to assess their knowledge (see also discussions in Okanda & Itakura, 2010;Okanda et al, 2012). Okanda et al (2013) to the interviewers in the videos by saying "yes" or "no." Okanda et al (2013) to the interviewers in the videos by saying "yes" or "no."…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 94%

“…Japanese 4-year-olds could also say "no" to their mothers when they were asked knowledge-assessment questions (Okanda et al, 2012). That is, older Japanese children are likely to say "yes" when they feel social pressure (see also Okanda et al, 2012;Okanda & Itakura, 2011;Okanda, Kanda, Ishiguro, & Itakura, 2013). That is, older Japanese children are likely to say "yes" when they feel social pressure (see also Okanda et al, 2012;Okanda & Itakura, 2011;Okanda, Kanda, Ishiguro, & Itakura, 2013).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…That is, older Japanese children are likely to say "yes" when they feel social pressure (see also Okanda et al, 2012;Okanda & Itakura, 2011;Okanda, Kanda, Ishiguro, & Itakura, 2013). Okanda et al (2013) considered a robot to be a less authoritative interviewer compared to an adult stranger, and they therefore hypothesized that 4-year-olds might not show a yes bias to a robot. Okanda et al (2013) considered a robot to be a less authoritative interviewer compared to an adult stranger, and they therefore hypothesized that 4-year-olds might not show a yes bias to a robot.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Okanda et al (2013) to the interviewers in the videos by saying "yes" or "no." They exhibited a nay-saying bias to questions about unfamiliar objects in both robot and adult video conditions, which did not differ significantly (Okanda et al, 2013). Further, 4-year-olds might be likely to say "yes" to an adult in the live interaction but not to an adult in the video.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

I hear your yes‐no questions: Children's response tendencies to a humanoid robot

Okanda

Zhou

Kanda³

et al. 2018

Infant and Child Development

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study investigated the responses of 4‐ and 5‐year‐old Japanese children to yes‐no questions about familiar and unfamiliar objects that were asked by a communicative or a non‐communicative humanoid robot. The children in the communicative condition watched a pretrial video in which a humanoid robot interacted with a human adult, and those in the non‐communicative condition watched a pretrial video in which the same humanoid robot was unresponsive to the same human adult's utterances and actions. Then, all the children watched a video in which the robot asked 24 yes‐no questions. The results indicated that 4‐ and 5‐year‐olds in the two conditions showed similar response tendencies, with no age differences. Further, the children showed no response biases to familiar objects and nay‐saying bias to unfamiliar objects. Children's perception of robots is discussed. Highlights We investigated whether 4‐ to 5‐year‐olds answer humanoid robot's yes‐no questions. The children were asked yes‐no questions by either a communicative and non‐communicative humanoid robot. Children in both age groups in two conditions showed similar response tendencies to humanoid robot: They may have expectation for humanoid robots that they are communicative partner.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 94%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

I hear your yes‐no questions: Children's response tendencies to a humanoid robot

Okanda

Zhou

Kanda³

et al. 2018

Infant and Child Development

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Contudo, variáveis como a capacidade de memória (Cunha, 2010;Henry & Gudjonsson, 2003), o domínio da linguagem (Scullin, Kanaya, & Ceci, 2002), a relação com as funções executivas (Karpinski & Scullin, 2009), a desejabilidade social na resposta (Costa & Pinho, 2010) ou a pressão exercida por uma fi gura de autoridade/adulto (Okanda, Kanda, Ishiguro, & Itakura, 2013) têm também sido estudados.…”

Section: O Estudo Da Sugestionabilidade Infantilunclassified

Influência da idade, desejabilidade social e memória na sugestionabilidade infantil

Saraiva¹,

Albuquerque²

2015

Psicol. Reflex. Crit.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ResumoA sugestionabilidade infantil é infl uenciada pela capacidade de memória, idade ou desejabilidade social. Este estudo teve como objetivo estudar estes fatores em três grupos de crianças com idades de 5/6 anos, 8/9 anos e 10/11 anos. Para tanto procedemos à construção de uma escala de avaliação da sugestionabilidade infantil baseada na Escala de Sugestionabilidade de Gudjonsson (GSS; Gudjonsson, 1997). Os resultados obtidos revelaram que as crianças mais novas foram as mais sugestionáveis, fenômeno que parece estar associado ao elevado grau de desejabilidade social das suas respostas. Relativamente à memória fonológica, verifi camos que a sua menor amplitude esteve também relacionada com maior sugestionabilidade infantil. Sugere-se que as variáveis memória e desejabilidade social sejam cuidadosamente consideradas no momento de obtenção do testemunho de crianças. Palavras-chave: Sugestionabilidade infantil, memória, desejabilidade social, testemunho infantil. AbstractChildren's suggestibility is infl uenced by several factors such as memory, age or social desirability. The main objective of this study was to analyze how these factors are associated with the degree of suggestibility in 5/6 year-old, 8/9 year-old and 10/11 year-old children. For a suggestibility measure, a new scale based on the Gudjonsson Suggestibility Scale was developed (GSS; Gudjonsson, 1997). Results showed that: younger children are more suggestible than older children; a higher degree of social desirability is associated with stronger suggestibility responses; and a smaller memory span is related to greater children's suggestibility. Conclusions highlight that memory and social desirability should be analyzed carefully when eyewitness accounts of children are considered. Keywords: Children's suggestibility, memory, social desirability, child witness. * Endereço para correspondência: Universidade do Minho, Escola de Psicologia, Campus de Gualtar, Braga, Portugal 4715-229. E-mail: pedro.b.albuquerque@psi.uminho.pt A credibilidade dos relatos baseados nas nossas memórias e a veracidade fatual das memórias da infância tem levado a Psicologia Forense a interessar-se cada vez mais pelo estudo da credibilidade dos testemunhos em geral, e das crianças em particular. Nesse cenário, e também devido ao interesse crescente pelo estudo das memórias falsas, muito se tem especulado e investigado acerca da sugestionabilidade em crianças.Compreender o funcionamento da memória passa por perceber os efeitos que o decurso do tempo tem sobre o esquecimento de acontecimentos vividos, mas também sobre a sua distorção. Dessa forma, quanto mais tempo decorre entre um acontecimento e a sua recordação, mais informação se esquece ou distorce, tornando-se, com passar do tempo, as memórias do acontecimento cada vez menos detalhadas ou pormenorizadas (Roediger & McDermott, 1995;Schacter, 1999). Relativamente às distorções de memória em crianças esse dado é ainda mais saliente e eloquente (Costa & Pinho, 2010).A Psicologia Cognitiva Forense tem desenvolvido esforços ...

show abstract

Children's response biases to results of object sharing

Okanda

Taniguchi

2020

Applied Cognitive Psychology

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Summary This study investigated whether 2‐ to 6‐year‐old children exhibit a response bias to questions pertaining to the results of sharing objects that should attract their interest. An experimenter distributed four objects between herself/himself and a child, equally or unequally (more to the child or more to the experimenter) and asked the child yes‐no questions: “Is this okay?” and “Is this bad?” The results indicated that 2‐ and 3‐year‐olds exhibited a yes bias in all conditions, 4‐year‐olds exhibited a yes bias to the equal condition and to the unequal condition with more distributed to the child, and 5‐year‐olds exhibited a yes bias to both unequal conditions, whereas 6‐year‐olds did not show any response bias. Young preschoolers exhibited a yes bias regardless of questions and children may become able to say both “yes” and “no” appropriately to questions about object sharing after the age of six.

show abstract

Three- and 4-year-old children’s response tendencies to various interviewers

Cited by 18 publications

References 20 publications

I hear your yes‐no questions: Children's response tendencies to a humanoid robot

I hear your yes‐no questions: Children's response tendencies to a humanoid robot

Influência da idade, desejabilidade social e memória na sugestionabilidade infantil

Children's response biases to results of object sharing

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About