2015
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)hy.1943-7900.0001053
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Three Abutment Scour Conditions at Bridge Waterways

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is generally known that scour around abutment is caused by the flow contraction due to the blockage of the abutment and the large‐scale turbulence from flow separation at the tip of abutment. Hence, abutment and contraction scour may occur concurrently, and it is often difficult to separate both of them (Abdelaziz & Lim, 2021; Ettema et al, 2010; Hong, 2012; Yorozuya & Ettema, 2015). In this present analysis, the effect of contraction is included in the abutment scour formulation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is generally known that scour around abutment is caused by the flow contraction due to the blockage of the abutment and the large‐scale turbulence from flow separation at the tip of abutment. Hence, abutment and contraction scour may occur concurrently, and it is often difficult to separate both of them (Abdelaziz & Lim, 2021; Ettema et al, 2010; Hong, 2012; Yorozuya & Ettema, 2015). In this present analysis, the effect of contraction is included in the abutment scour formulation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The variation of ufte/yf with ( BfnormalLtrue)/Bf for the present study is shown in Figure 6. The term ( BfnormalLtrue)/Bf represents the effect of contraction scour for abutment on floodplain, and some studies have suggested that the effect of contraction scour should be included in the abutment scour prediction formulas because abutment and contraction scour may occur concurrently (Ettema et al, 2010; Sturm et al, 2011; Yorozuya & Ettema, 2015). However, Melville and Coleman (2000) disagreed and reported that the two types of scour should be independent.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table 4.9 VW Data of Chua (2013) in compound channel………….. Kose (2007) in rectangular channel………….. Table 4.16 The suggested abutment shape factors…………………….. Table 4.17 ST Data of Ballegooy (2005) in compound channel………. The position of deepest point of scour hole for erodible spill through abutment (Yorozuya and Ettema, 2015).. Scour Type 1a -local scour on bed of main channel (Ettema et al, 2003)………………………………….…”
Section: List Of Tablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As result, as the flow intensity decreases, the location of maximum scour depth shifts further laterally from the abutment nose to the centerline of flume. Yorozuya and Ettema (2015) experimentally studied the position of maximum scour depth around spill-through setback erodible abutment to check the geotechnical stability of erodible embankment. They used similar coordinates of Ballegooy (2005) and Melville et al (2006) (see Figure 2.11).…”
Section: Location Of Maximum Scour Depthmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation