Threat, Victimhood, and Peace: Debating the 2011 Palestinian UN State Membership Bid

Abstract

The Israeli–Palestinian conflict has been described as one of the most intractable in the world. This article first provides an overview of the sociopolitical events that led up to the Palestinian UN state membership bid in September 2011, and second, as a case study, it examines how the Israeli–Palestinian conflict was constructed in speeches delivered by Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu regarding the state membership bid to the UN General Assembly in September 2011. Despite their opposing agendas, there are some significant discursive similarities in the two speeches. The most salient shared discourses concern that of in‐group victimhood on the one hand, and that of out‐group threat on the other. It is argued that the speeches dispel support for intergroup reconciliation between Israelis and Palestinians by aggravating grievances on both sides and accentuating intergroup suspicion. This article highlights the importance of examining political speeches in order to better understand the Israeli–Palestinian conflict.

Can Abraham bring peace? The relationship between acknowledging shared religious roots and intergroup conflict.

“…For instance, Rouhana and Bar-Tal (1998) stated in relation to the Jewish and Islamic states that are vying for control in the region, “both the claims of the religious Zionist parties for a Jewish state in the entire Land of Israel and Hamas for an Islamic state in all of Palestine invoke deep religious beliefs to rationalize their political claims” (p. 764). The divides evoked by these religious differences can be seen in the contestation over the status of Jerusalem (Armstrong, 2005; Jaspal & Coyle, 2014). Indeed, one of the first major clashes between Jews and Muslims in the Twentieth Century was sparked by conflict over praying rights at the Western Wall in Jerusalem (Cohen, 2015).…”

Bridging Micro, Meso, and Macro Processes in Social Psychology

“…Objectification is the process whereby unfamiliar and abstract objects are transformed into concrete and "objective" common-sense realities. For instance, the metaphors of "freedom fighter" versus "terrorist" demonstrate the radically different social, political and ethical perspectives that Israelis and Palestinians often take in relation to their long-standing intergroup conflict (Jaspal & Coyle, 2014).…”

‘Well, our goal is to achieve sustainable quiet and security for our people’: negotiating calls for ceasefires in the Gaza War of 2014.

“…Achieving an end to conflict is then a significant and sensitive issue as spokespersons for parties in conflict -Israel and Hamas or Palestinian representatives -orient to inabilities in achieving or maintaining peace as reflecting problematic positions. Jaspal and Coyle (2014) show that Palestinian leaders, in ways similar to Israeli leaders, claim 'victim' status for themselves. The authors argue that these claims minimize efforts towards and support for any form of reconciliation.…”