Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work &Amp; Social Computing 2016
DOI: 10.1145/2818048.2819934
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thousands of Positive Reviews

Abstract: Young people worldwide are participating in ever-increasing numbers in online fan communities. Far from mere shallow repositories of pop culture, these sites are accumulating significant evidence that sophisticated informal learning is taking place online in novel and unexpected ways. In order to understand and analyze in more detail how learning might be occurring, we conducted an in-depth nine-month ethnographic investigation of online fanfiction communities, including participant observation and fanfiction … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
31
0
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
2
31
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…-and use or remediate it to produce related but often widely divergent media. Dedicated fans take the time to maintain wikis, administrate online forums and message boards [14], and mentor novice fans [21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…-and use or remediate it to produce related but often widely divergent media. Dedicated fans take the time to maintain wikis, administrate online forums and message boards [14], and mentor novice fans [21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Shepherd system [10] allows workers to exchange synchronous feedback with requesters. Crowd guilds scale up this notion of distributed feedback [6] to make peer assessment and collective reputation management a core feature of a crowdsourcing platform.…”
Section: Improving Work Qualitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The advice and feedback provided in peer assessment can facilitate distributed mentorship [6]. Self and peer assessment can train reviewers to become better at the craft themselves [30,1,10], and feedback from those with more expertise improves result quality [10,39].…”
Section: Peer Assessment Driving Qualitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, a community might host contests or challenges where participating users create work based on the same theme, or provide social features such as messaging and forums that allow users to collaborate in co-producing work. In addition, an online creative community giving feedback to each other can, in aggregate, provide positive mentoring experiences distinct from traditional offline mentoring [13]. The interactions that users engage in on these communities may differ depending on whether users consider themselves professionals or hobbyists [35].…”
Section: Online Creative Communitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%