1997
DOI: 10.1037/0021-843x.106.4.511
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thoughts of agoraphobic people during scary tasks.

Abstract: The authors examined the occurrence of theoretically derived patterns of thinking in 74 agoraphobic participants as they drove alone or tolerated an enclosed place. During the increasingly scary tasks in a behavioral test hierarchy, participants responded to a periodic beep by stating aloud what they were thinking at that moment, yielding more than 1,800 tape-recorded statements. Content analyses revealed that participants were mainly preoccupied with their current anxiety (expressed in 29% of the statements) … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
(81 reference statements)
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In support of his claim, Bandura noted that acrophobics display fear when found in tall buildings, because they are unable to quell horrendous thoughts despite the safety of their situation. However, findings inconsistent with this claim indicate that perception of danger is, in fact, a weak predictor of acrophobic behavior (Menzies & Clarke, 1995b;Williams, Turner, & Peer, 1985;Williams & Watson, 1985) and that agoraphobics are rarely preoccupied with thoughts of danger when confronted with their feared situation (Williams, Kinney, Harap, & Liebmann, 1997). Hence, as noted by Williams et al (1997), "rarity of danger thoughts poses an explanatory challenge for all cognitive theories of phobia and especially for the perceived danger theory" (p. 511).…”
Section: Conditioning Modelmentioning
confidence: 59%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In support of his claim, Bandura noted that acrophobics display fear when found in tall buildings, because they are unable to quell horrendous thoughts despite the safety of their situation. However, findings inconsistent with this claim indicate that perception of danger is, in fact, a weak predictor of acrophobic behavior (Menzies & Clarke, 1995b;Williams, Turner, & Peer, 1985;Williams & Watson, 1985) and that agoraphobics are rarely preoccupied with thoughts of danger when confronted with their feared situation (Williams, Kinney, Harap, & Liebmann, 1997). Hence, as noted by Williams et al (1997), "rarity of danger thoughts poses an explanatory challenge for all cognitive theories of phobia and especially for the perceived danger theory" (p. 511).…”
Section: Conditioning Modelmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…However, although negative thoughts preoccupy the individual's attention when exposed to the stimuli that they fear (De Jongh, Muris, Schoenmakers, & Ter Horst, 1995;De Jongh, Muris, Ter Horst, & Duyx, 1995;De Jongh & Ter Horst, 1993;Kent & Gibbons, 1987;Thorpe & Salkovskis, 1995), some studies indicate that negative cognitions follow, rather than precede, the experience of fear (Wolpe & Rowan, 1988). Moreover, negative thoughts may be a direct consequence of the fear ("If I feel anxious, there must be danger"; Arntz, Rauner, & Van den Hout, 1995), and fear may also be experienced in the absence of negative cognitions (Barlow, Brown, & Craske, 1994;Fleet et al, 2000;Kushner & Beitman, 1990;Williams et al, 1997). …”
Section: Conditioning Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Notwithstanding, the ASI does not lend evidence to whether such thoughts and feelings are actually occurring in real time. Here, further research on approaches such as the think-aloud paradigm (Davison, Vogel, & Coffman, 1997; Davison, Williams, Nezami, Bice, & DeQuattro, 1991; Williams, Kinney, Harap, & Liebmann, 1997) will allow testing of symptom appraisal in real time. An example for capturing “in-the-moment” appraisals during cognitive skill training and exposure, using the think-aloud technique, is described below (see “Think-Aloud Paradigm”).…”
Section: Exploring Mechanism Of Therapy Success In Pdmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a recent pilot study, we tested the feasibility of a modified and extended version of the think-aloud paradigm (Davison et al, 1991, 1997; Williams et al, 1997). The paradigm is aimed at assessing concurrent, situation-specific, and participant representative thoughts both during skill acquisition and application.…”
Section: Assessment Of Cognitive Appraisal/acceptance Skills: Think-amentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation