2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.concog.2017.08.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thoughts and sensations, twin galaxies of the inner space: The propensity to mind-wander relates to spontaneous sensations arising on the hands

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
26
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
2
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From a rs-fc perspective, the operculo-insular region as part of the temporo-parietal junction is closely connected to the salience network (Kucyi, Hodaie, & Davis, 2012), but also plays a role in embodiment and self-awareness (Michael, Tapiero, Gálvez-García, & Jacquot, 2017). As such, it makes sense that the operculo-insular region does not only play a fundamental role in pain perception in terms of nociceptive processing, but also serves a central hub integrating the information from various brain sites enabling the emergence of pain from nociception.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From a rs-fc perspective, the operculo-insular region as part of the temporo-parietal junction is closely connected to the salience network (Kucyi, Hodaie, & Davis, 2012), but also plays a role in embodiment and self-awareness (Michael, Tapiero, Gálvez-García, & Jacquot, 2017). As such, it makes sense that the operculo-insular region does not only play a fundamental role in pain perception in terms of nociceptive processing, but also serves a central hub integrating the information from various brain sites enabling the emergence of pain from nociception.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To our knowledge, along with interoception, the perception of SPS is a domain that seems related to that aspect of embodiment that is the direct and immediate experience of our own body in the first-person perspective. The difference between interoception and SPS perception is that the former targets the monitoring of internal bodily signals (Vaitl, 1996) while the latter expands to feeling one's own body and its boundaries (Naveteur et al, 2015;Michael et al, 2017). However, both are encompassed by the broader definition of interoception [(Bud) Craig, 2003] and are seemingly related phenomena (Michael et al, 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, both are encompassed by the broader definition of interoception [(Bud) Craig, 2003] and are seemingly related phenomena (Michael et al, 2015). The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between the perception of SPS and embodiment, since the literature provides mostly indirect evidence of this (Michael and Naveteur, 2011;Bauer et al, 2014b;Michael et al, 2017). This was achieved by combining an SPS perception task, an experimental ownbody mental transformation task (OBT task), and a questionnaire assessing schizotypal personality traits.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations