2022
DOI: 10.1002/jcu.23137
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thoracic ultrasound competence for ultrasound guided pleural procedures: The creation and validation of an assessment tool for use in the certification of basic thoracic ultrasound competence

Abstract: Objectives: Focused thoracic ultrasound (TUS) provides an increased safety profile when undertaking invasive pleural procedures. This has led to the requirement for defined curricula, high quality teaching and robust, validated assessment tools among physicians to ensure patient safety and clinical excellence. Current UK practice is based almost exclusively on expert consensus, but assessment methods employed have been shown to have low reliability and validity and are potentially open to bias. As a result, se… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 20 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…International guidelines recommend all pleural procedures (for fluid) should be performed under TUS guidance [20]. Formal TUS training curriculum, training standards and credentialing have been in place in many countries, including the United Kingdom, Europe and the Australasia [21][22][23][24]. Clear training structure in clinician-based ultrasonography is lacking in many Asian countries including Hong Kong.…”
Section: N=16 N=42mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…International guidelines recommend all pleural procedures (for fluid) should be performed under TUS guidance [20]. Formal TUS training curriculum, training standards and credentialing have been in place in many countries, including the United Kingdom, Europe and the Australasia [21][22][23][24]. Clear training structure in clinician-based ultrasonography is lacking in many Asian countries including Hong Kong.…”
Section: N=16 N=42mentioning
confidence: 99%