1999
DOI: 10.1080/10481889909539328
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thomas Ogden's phenomenological turn

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0
2

Year Published

1999
1999
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
13
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Rather than an interaction of separate subjectivities, we have a more complex dialectic of oscillation between our private separateness and the contextual ground of our intercorporeal connectedness. This entails a critique of an interpersonal and relational framing of subjectivity and intersubjectivity, which remains a key point of difference in traditions, but one that is not yet fully explicated beyond initial steps (see Coelho, 2015;Foehl, 2011; Downloaded by [University of Nebraska, Lincoln] at 17:04 13 June 2016 Reis, 1999). Although this phenomenological perspective is simply one possible field among many, it is a perspective that starts with the structure of experience, something to consider when looking for psychoanalytic foundations in addressing intersubjectivity today.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Rather than an interaction of separate subjectivities, we have a more complex dialectic of oscillation between our private separateness and the contextual ground of our intercorporeal connectedness. This entails a critique of an interpersonal and relational framing of subjectivity and intersubjectivity, which remains a key point of difference in traditions, but one that is not yet fully explicated beyond initial steps (see Coelho, 2015;Foehl, 2011; Downloaded by [University of Nebraska, Lincoln] at 17:04 13 June 2016 Reis, 1999). Although this phenomenological perspective is simply one possible field among many, it is a perspective that starts with the structure of experience, something to consider when looking for psychoanalytic foundations in addressing intersubjectivity today.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Se trata de fundamentos filosóficos de relevancia central en la medida en la que el escenario psicoanalítico contemporáneo a veces ha sido caracterizado como resultado de un giro fenomenológico hacia la experiencia vivida y su comprensión (Atwood & Stolorow, 2014; Jordán, 2008;Leffert, 2016;Lichtenberg, Lachmann & Fosshage, 2016;Mitchell, 1993;Reis, 1999;Sassenfeld, 2012aSassenfeld, , 2016aSassenfeld, , 2016bStern, 2015;Stern, 2004;Stolorow, Atwood & Orange, 2002;Summers, 2013Summers, , 2015Wachtel, 2008). En otras palabras, en el mundo psicoanalítico actual existe una cierta consciencia de cuánto el movimiento relacional le debe a la fenomenología y, tal como queda en evidencia en el trabajo de destacados teóricos relacionales e intersubjetivos (Orange, 1995(Orange, , 2011Sassenfeld, 2010bSassenfeld, , 2012aSassenfeld, , 2016bStern, 1997Stern, , 2010Stern, , 2015, también a la hermenéutica fenomenológica.…”
Section: Ceir Vol 11 (3) -Octubre 2017 Issn 1988-2939 -Wwwceirinfounclassified
“…The question, here, is that Ogden's intersubjectivity does not refer to the in‐between subjectivities , but on what might be called a primordial intersubjectivity – a situation in which the subjectivities constitute themselves mutually, in a manner whereby the individual subjects do not come before the intersubjectivity or vice versa. This is visible in the fact that the analyst enters into contact with this intersubjective field precisely through “the ways in which he is inextricably given to himself” and through his “very private dimensions” (Reis, , p. 390). And this understanding of intersubjectivity involves a corresponding revision of the concept of individual subjectivity: “The analytic conception of the subject has increasingly become a theory of the interdependence of subjectivity and intersubjectivity” (Ogden, , p. 60).…”
Section: Ogden and The Analytic Thirdmentioning
confidence: 99%