1991
DOI: 10.1016/0375-9474(91)90418-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thomas-Fermi approach to nuclear mass formula

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
46
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 111 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
1
46
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The trend of ε 0 from the Skyrme force SkM* is similar to those from HFB17 which is based on the Skyrme force Bsk17 [14]. With the help of the ETF2 approach, we obtain the coefficient of the I 4 term a Table I, denoted by a (4) sym (208) and a (4) sym (40), respectively. For almost all 36 selected Skyrme forces, the coefficients a (4) sym for finite nuclei are negative.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…The trend of ε 0 from the Skyrme force SkM* is similar to those from HFB17 which is based on the Skyrme force Bsk17 [14]. With the help of the ETF2 approach, we obtain the coefficient of the I 4 term a Table I, denoted by a (4) sym (208) and a (4) sym (40), respectively. For almost all 36 selected Skyrme forces, the coefficients a (4) sym for finite nuclei are negative.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…Until recently the masses and barriers used in all studies of the r-process were calculated on the basis of one form or another of the liquid-drop(let) model (LDM). However, in an attempt to put the extrapolations on as rigorous a footing as possible we have developed a mass formula that is based entirely on microscopic forces, the ETFSI-1 mass formula [3,4,5,6,7]. Calculations of the r-process using the ETFSI-1 masses have already been performed [8,9], but they are incomplete in that fission had to be neglected, barriers not yet having been calculated in the ETFSI model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7 compare the experimental masses with the extended Thomas-Fermi model of Pearson et al [42]. This model avoids the arbitrary division in a macroscopic and a microscopic part by calculating both gross and single particle e ects from the same Skyrme force.…”
Section: Comparison With Mass Formulaementioning
confidence: 95%
“…The adjusted masses represent the zero line and their uncertainties are given by the error band. The models are from top to bottom: Janecke and Masson [36], Du o and Zuker [39], Moller et al [40,41], and Pearson et al [42]. For each model the RMS deviation is given in the gure.…”
Section: T I M E [ S ]mentioning
confidence: 99%