2010
DOI: 10.1215/00182702-2010-035
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thomas Chalmers: The Market, Moral Conduct, and Social Order

Abstract: Combining elements of Adam Smith's third-party perspective with the evangelical view of life as a trial, Thomas Chalmers argued for a market-based social order. The viability of this order would depend on the capacity to develop character in response to the choices made possible by the market itself. Character could replace administrative interventions. Chalmers saw well-intentioned administration, especially with respect to the poor laws, as both crowding out inner motivations and creating a focus for the fer… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 12 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“… 2 This concept of unity through a dialectical process was later cherished by the advocates of a clerisy (for example, Thomas Chalmers’s idea of “market as trial,” Samuel Taylor Coleridge’s concept of social harmony as balance between two magnetic poles, and John Stuart Mill’s study of the tension between following customs and the pursuit of “higher pleasures”), who may well represent the immediate legacy of Smith’s last teachings and admonitions regarding wisdom (Knights 1978; McPherson 1982; Dickey 1986; Dixon and Wilson 2010 and 2013). …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 2 This concept of unity through a dialectical process was later cherished by the advocates of a clerisy (for example, Thomas Chalmers’s idea of “market as trial,” Samuel Taylor Coleridge’s concept of social harmony as balance between two magnetic poles, and John Stuart Mill’s study of the tension between following customs and the pursuit of “higher pleasures”), who may well represent the immediate legacy of Smith’s last teachings and admonitions regarding wisdom (Knights 1978; McPherson 1982; Dickey 1986; Dixon and Wilson 2010 and 2013). …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%