2022
DOI: 10.1002/acp.3926
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

This should help with that: A behavioral investigation into self‐derivation of knowledge about prescription medications

Abstract: Self‐derivation of new factual knowledge is crucial for building a knowledge base. In three experiments, we investigated self‐derivation about prescription medications. In Experiment 1, adults self‐derived new knowledge across textual materials on 40% of trials. Participants in Experiment 2 performed similarly (42%), even when half the information was presented in videos. It was crucial that participants received both learning episodes to successfully self‐derive: control condition participants received half t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 28 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is not that the skills are absent—children perform well when correct responses can be selected from among distracters (i.e., in forced-choice testing: e.g., Esposito & Bauer, 2017). As another example, although adults are quite adept at integration and self-derivation when tested with individual facts presented in single sentences or even one word at a time (50%–65% correct open-ended self-derivation), when they are tasked with integrating and self-deriving information from “naturalistic” sources such as video or print advertisements for prescription medications, performance is still indicative of integration and self-derivation of new knowledge, yet is negatively impacted (i.e., roughly 40% correct open-ended self-derivation: Dugan & Bauer, 2022).…”
Section: Generalizations: the Gremlinsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is not that the skills are absent—children perform well when correct responses can be selected from among distracters (i.e., in forced-choice testing: e.g., Esposito & Bauer, 2017). As another example, although adults are quite adept at integration and self-derivation when tested with individual facts presented in single sentences or even one word at a time (50%–65% correct open-ended self-derivation), when they are tasked with integrating and self-deriving information from “naturalistic” sources such as video or print advertisements for prescription medications, performance is still indicative of integration and self-derivation of new knowledge, yet is negatively impacted (i.e., roughly 40% correct open-ended self-derivation: Dugan & Bauer, 2022).…”
Section: Generalizations: the Gremlinsmentioning
confidence: 99%