Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work &Amp; Social Computing 2016
DOI: 10.1145/2818048.2819992
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

“This has to be the cats”

Abstract: Notions like 'Big Data' and the 'Internet of Things' turn upon anticipated harvesting of personal data through ubiquitous computing and networked sensing systems. It is largely presumed that understandings of people's everyday interactions will be relatively easy to 'read off' of such data and that this, in turn, poses a privacy threat. An ethnographic study of how people account for sensed data to third parties uncovers serious challenges to such ideas. The study reveals that the legibility of sensor data tur… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
50
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
(11 reference statements)
3
50
1
Order By: Relevance
“…One such article examines the social and relational aspects of how people interact with data, with a special eye to how personal data may get articulated [18]. Another looks at how people work with, render intelligible, and account for sensor traces of their own activity [75]. Crabtree and Mortier [19] examine how the processing of personal data in the context of the Internet of Things may be resulting in a shift in where matters such as agency and control may be said to operate and, in a related paper, Crabtree et al [20] look at how new developments in how personal data may be managed could be giving rise to a 'new economic actor'.…”
Section: Respecifying the Interestmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One such article examines the social and relational aspects of how people interact with data, with a special eye to how personal data may get articulated [18]. Another looks at how people work with, render intelligible, and account for sensor traces of their own activity [75]. Crabtree and Mortier [19] examine how the processing of personal data in the context of the Internet of Things may be resulting in a shift in where matters such as agency and control may be said to operate and, in a related paper, Crabtree et al [20] look at how new developments in how personal data may be managed could be giving rise to a 'new economic actor'.…”
Section: Respecifying the Interestmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A particular issue that has already been partially reported elsewhere [75] is the potential for new technology to surface information about one another's activities that would ordinarily be expected to remain out of view. Or, at least, for the circumstances to not arise where one might be obliged to account for it, and for others to be put in a position where they have little choice but to request such an account.…”
Section: The Recipients Of Shared Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While prior CSCW work has centered on biosensing data legibility and interpretability (e.g. [42,61]), what constitutes a violation of privacy with regard to these devices is not always clear. We find biosensing technologies a useful domain for our design workbooks to explore how different configurations and relations between people, institutions, and technologies might implicate values related to privacy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is therefore tempting to imagine that for assisted living services, this combination of IoT and machine learning offers the promise of making possible the real-time, remote monitoring of people in ways that would improve on the crude capabilities of the current generation of fall devices, pendant alarms, GPS trackers, and so on, creating opportunities for new and more effective, technologically supported articulation work (Chen 2012). However, such optimism may be misplaced: others argue that making sense of such data itself poses challenges that require human articulation work to resolve them (Tolmie et al 2016). Finally, IoT faces major challenges in addressing privacy, security, and safety, which will need to be addressed if it is to meet the requirements of health and social care providers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%