Thirty years of the <i>International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing</i>: a bibliometric analysis

Laengle, Sigifredo; Modak, Nikunja Mohan; Merigó, José M.; Sotta, Catalina de la

doi:10.1080/0951192x.2018.1529434

Cited by 40 publications

(24 citation statements)

References 44 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Additionally, it also considers the citations per paper ratio, citations thresholds and the hindex [40]. The h-index is a measure that connects publications with citations by analysing the X number of papers that have received X citation or more [41][42]. The h-index has been extended and generalised under a wide range of frameworks [43].…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Half a century of computer methods and programs in biomedicine: A bibliometric analysis from 1970 to 2017

Shukla

Merigó

Lammers

et al. 2020

Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background and Objective: Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine (CMPB) is a leading international journal that presents developments about computing methods and their application in biomedical research. The journal published its first issue in 1970. In 2020, the journal celebrates the 50th anniversary. Motivated by this event, this article presents a bibliometric analysis of the publications of the journal during this period (1970-2017). Methods: The objective is to identify the leading trends occurring in the journal by analysing the most cited papers, keywords, authors, institutions and countries. For doing so, the study uses the Web of Science Core Collection database. Additionally, the work presents a graphical mapping of the bibliographic information by using the visualization of similarities (VOS) viewer software. This is done to analyze bibliographic coupling, co-citation and co-occurrence of keywords. Results: CMPB is identified as a leading and core journal for biomedical researchers. The journal is strongly connected to IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering and IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging. Paper from Wang, Jacques, Zheng (published in 1995) is its most cited document. The top author in this journal is James Geoffrey Chase and the top contributing institution is Uppsala U (Sweden). Most of the papers in CMPB are from the USA followed by the UK and Italy. China and Taiwan are the only Asian countries to appear in the top 10 publishing in CMPB. A keyword co-occurrences analysis revealed strong co-occurrences for classification, picture archiving and communication system (PACS), heart rate variability, survival analysis and simulation. Keywords analysis for the last decade revealed that machine learning for a variety of healthcare problems (including image processing and analysis) dominated other research fields in CMPB. Conclusions: It can be concluded that CMPB is a world-renowned publication outlet for biomedical researchers which has been growing in a number of publications since 1970. The analysis also conclude that the journal is very international with publications from all over the world although today European countries are the most productive ones.

show abstract

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Half a century of computer methods and programs in biomedicine: A bibliometric analysis from 1970 to 2017

Shukla

Merigó

Lammers

et al. 2020

Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Many journals have been evaluated by using data included in Scopus, including among others Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing (Valenzuela et al, 2017), Journal of Infection and Public Health (Krauskopf, 2018), European Journal of Marketing (Laengle et al, 2018) and Journal of Knowledge Management (Gaviria-Marin et al, 2019).…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

A bibliometric analysis and visualization of the Journal of Documentation: 1945–2018

Mokhtari

Barkhan

Haseli

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

PurposeAs a pioneering and influential journal in the field of library and information science (LIS), the Journal of Documentation (JDoc) needs to be evaluated from a bibliometric perspective. This study aimed at conducting a bibliometric overview and visualization of the scientific output of JDoc from its inception in 1945–2018.Design/methodology/approachIn this bibliometric study, 2056 papers published in JDoc were analyzed. All needed data were extracted from Scopus in 9 July 2019 in CSV format. Bibliometric analyses were done in Microsoft Excel. Visualization was done by Vosviewer software and applying techniques such as co-citation, co-authorship and co-occurrence. As a limited altmetric study, JDoc highly mentioned papers and the rate of their presence in social media were extracted from Altmetric LLP, too.FindingsThere was an increasing trend in published papers and received citations. Highly cited and most influential authors in JDoc are well-known in the field. However, the contributions of developing countries and their affiliated institutions to the journal were relatively low. This is true in case of author, country and institute co-authorship patterns. Highly frequent keywords and keyword co-occurrence patterns showed that the journal considered most topics related to LIS, including newly emerged ones. The authors and sources (generally journals) cited by JDoc are all prolific and influential ones.Originality/valueThe results of this study can be beneficial to JDoc editorial team for decision making on its further development as well as helpful for researchers and practitioners interesting in LIS field to have better contact with and contributions to the journal.

show abstract

“…Co-citation of journals occurs when two documents of two different journals receive a citation from the same third document of another journal [13]. The co-citations of journals in HSM are shown in Fig.…”

Section: Intellectual Networking Of Hsmmentioning

confidence: 99%

Human systems management: A retrospective of 40 years

Shahzad

Farrukh

et al. 2021

HSM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

BACKGROUND: For augmentation and sustainability of Human Systems Management (HSM), it is significant to analyse and reposition journals, which is very well done by bibliometric analysis. OBJECTIVE: The study aims to provide the retrospective of HSM between 1980– 2019. METHOD: Scopus database has been employed to bibliographic indicators for the representation of available data for forty years. By utilising the VOSviewer software, bibliographic materials being drawn from keywords, graphical visuals, bibliographic coupling & co-citation analysis have been done. RESULTS: Results enabled to establish that the average number of publications remained almost the same throughout forty years, tinting the journal has been as vital in 2019 for researchers as it was in 1980. Citations originated drastic mounting with recently published documents in comparison with earlier production. CONCLUSIONS: Authors and researchers are suggested to cover knowledge and knowledge management related articles. This study suggests management to ensure the inculcation of more related areas in the scope by announcing special issues to broaden the journals’ scope as it remained the main reason for limiting HSM from gaining as much attention as it deserved.

show abstract

Thirty years of the International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing: a bibliometric analysis

Cited by 40 publications

References 44 publications

Half a century of computer methods and programs in biomedicine: A bibliometric analysis from 1970 to 2017

Half a century of computer methods and programs in biomedicine: A bibliometric analysis from 1970 to 2017

A bibliometric analysis and visualization of the Journal of Documentation: 1945–2018

Human systems management: A retrospective of 40 years

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About