“…However, the correlation between total scores for the two versions is very high (r = .99, n = 21 cases; Gray, Viljoen, & Douglas, 2015). In a recent meta-analysis, the YLS/CMI demonstrated moderate associations with any and violent reoffending (r w = .32 and .26, respectively; Olver, Stockdale, & Wormith, 2014). In the present study, interater reliability was excellent for the YLS/CMI Risk Total Score (ICC = .82 for a two-way random effects model, single raters, absolute agreement, n = 28; Cicchetti, 1994;McGraw & Wong, 1996), fair to excellent for subscales (ICCs = .90,.54,.79,.75,.58,.60,.87,and .60 for Prior and Current Offenses, Family Circumstances/Parenting, Education/ Employment, Peer Associations, Substance Abuse, Leisure/Recreation, Personality/Behavior, and Attitudes/Orientation, respectively), and good for the summary risk rating (ICC = .71).…”