2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.clae.2020.03.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thirty years of ‘quiet eye’ with etafilcon A contact lenses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 142 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Presumably, one of the mechanisms is based on competition between negatively charged surface of a material (contact lenses; methacrylic acid of etafilcon A) and negatively charged bacterial membrane (binding of the peptide to biomaterial) for positively charged USCLs. In effect, the number of USCLs that are able to effectively disrupt pathogenic cells is reduced [ 55 , 56 ]. To sum up, it can be stated that one of the key factors influencing biofilm resistance to USCLs is the type of material on which it is formed.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Presumably, one of the mechanisms is based on competition between negatively charged surface of a material (contact lenses; methacrylic acid of etafilcon A) and negatively charged bacterial membrane (binding of the peptide to biomaterial) for positively charged USCLs. In effect, the number of USCLs that are able to effectively disrupt pathogenic cells is reduced [ 55 , 56 ]. To sum up, it can be stated that one of the key factors influencing biofilm resistance to USCLs is the type of material on which it is formed.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…24 This corresponds with SCL used in our study, Nelfilcon A, a polyvinyl alcohol-based conventional hydrogel contact lens with Dk/t 26 at -3.00 D, 69% water content, and 0.10 mm thickness. [25][26][27] This showed that SCL used in this study meets good criteria for daily wear SCL.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Conversely, when comparing normal and adverse environmental conditions, a greater reduction in comfort was observed when a SiHy was worn compared to a hydrogel contact lens [386]. Comfort also varies between different SiHy contact lenses [397,398], which suggests that other factors, such as the contact lens surface, design, material modulus and the care solution likely affect comfort [399]. However, contralateral eye studies comparing low modulus hydrogel to higher modulus SiHy contact lenses showed no differences in comfort [400,401].…”
Section: Risk Factors 931 Contact Lens-related Risk Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%