2016
DOI: 10.14503/thij-16-5870
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thirty-Three Years of Dizzy Medical Writing and Editing: A Meta-Analysis and the Hall of Shame

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…I have studied "dizzy medical writing and editing" for the past 33 years and have written extensively on that subject. [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12] Although the causes are many, several warrant emphasis. With many notable exceptions, physicians are bad writers.…”
Section: An Ample Competent and Experienced Editorial Staffmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…I have studied "dizzy medical writing and editing" for the past 33 years and have written extensively on that subject. [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12] Although the causes are many, several warrant emphasis. With many notable exceptions, physicians are bad writers.…”
Section: An Ample Competent and Experienced Editorial Staffmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Is it really necessary to note that unproductive diagnostic measures are unnecessary? 4 What can be done to improve the quality of writing in medicine? Medical schools and graduate programs in science could offer courses on how to explain complex topics in plain language.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%