Logic, Language and Computation
DOI: 10.1007/bfb0032405
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thirty four comparisons are required to sort 13 items

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…comparisons are necessary (see Knuth [5]). However, better lower bounds are obtained: Wells [8] obtained the greater lower bound for 12 elements, Kasai et al [4] for 13 elements, and Peczarski [6,7] for 14, 15, and 22 elements, by exhaustive computations. Ford-Johnson algorithm [2] gives upper bounds for the minimum number of comparisons.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…comparisons are necessary (see Knuth [5]). However, better lower bounds are obtained: Wells [8] obtained the greater lower bound for 12 elements, Kasai et al [4] for 13 elements, and Peczarski [6,7] for 14, 15, and 22 elements, by exhaustive computations. Ford-Johnson algorithm [2] gives upper bounds for the minimum number of comparisons.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Carrying an exhaustive computer search, Wells discovered in 1965 [9,10] that the FJA is optimal for 12 elements and S(12) = F (12) = C(12)+1 = 30. Kasai et al [3] computed S(13) = F (13) = C(13) + 1 = 34 in 1994, but that result was not widely known. It was discovered again a few years later [5], independently, extending the Wells method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%