2016
DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2015.4882
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thirty-Day Postoperative Mortality Risk Estimates and 1-Year Survival in Veterans Health Administration Surgery Patients

Abstract: Deciles of 30-day mortality estimates are associated with significantly different survival outcomes at 365 days even after removing patients who died within the first 30 postoperative days. No evidence of delays in patient care and treatment to meet a 30-day metric were identified. These findings reinforce the usefulness of 30-day mortality risk stratification as a surrogate for long-term outcomes.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
10
0
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
3
10
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Our findings are consistent with other recent estimates of 30 day and 1 yr mortality after high-risk surgery 26 and another recent epidemiological study of ICU use in Medicare beneficiaries undergoing major surgical procedures in the USA. 12 The latter study suggested little consensus on admission criteria and no evidence of improved outcome associated with routine ICU admission.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Our findings are consistent with other recent estimates of 30 day and 1 yr mortality after high-risk surgery 26 and another recent epidemiological study of ICU use in Medicare beneficiaries undergoing major surgical procedures in the USA. 12 The latter study suggested little consensus on admission criteria and no evidence of improved outcome associated with routine ICU admission.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Persistent SIRS appears to be a useful metric to gauge the therapeutic efficacy and prognosis following PC. These findings gain relevance in the context of recent work by Smith et al [26] which reinforced the validity of measuring 30-day mortality by demonstrating significant correlation to long-term outcomes. While 30-day mortality remains an important benchmark, our survival curves suggest that measuring 90-day mortality captures a substantial number of deaths which appear to be temporally related to the inciting event.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…There was a higher risk of mortality in the 14 days following day 365 among liver transplant recipients at non–low‐performing programs; however, this was not observed in the 30 days following day 365, limiting the credence of this finding. Altogether, this is consistent with other studies from the surgical literature which have looked at mortality in the time period immediately following the 30‐day mortality metric used to assess surgical procedures, with no evidence of increased mortality in the period immediately after 30 days 22‐24 …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%