2022
DOI: 10.1002/iub.2694
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thirteen dubious ways to detect conserved structural RNAs

Abstract: Covariation induced by compensatory base substitutions in RNA alignments is a great way to deduce conserved RNA structure, in principle. In practice, success depends on many factors, importantly the quality and depth of the alignment and the choice of covariation statistic. Measuring covariation between pairs of aligned positions is easy. However, using covariation to infer evolutionarily conserved RNA structure is complicated by other extraneous sources of covariation such as that resulting from homologous se… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 103 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These significantly covarying pairs that do not form any RNA helix are the result of another signal present in the alignment which results from the fact that COOLAIR class II.i isoform is antisense to the first exon of FLC. Variability within codon positions in alignments of protein-coding gene exons results in significant covariation above phylogenetic expectation that I have characterized elsewhere [8].…”
Section: Summarize the Results As Followsmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…These significantly covarying pairs that do not form any RNA helix are the result of another signal present in the alignment which results from the fact that COOLAIR class II.i isoform is antisense to the first exon of FLC. Variability within codon positions in alignments of protein-coding gene exons results in significant covariation above phylogenetic expectation that I have characterized elsewhere [8].…”
Section: Summarize the Results As Followsmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…Pseudogenes pose another challenge, as they exhibit sequence and structure conservation but do not function as ncRNAs. The presence of pseudogenes in alignments of structural ncRNAs can dilute the covariation signal, resulting in an overall increase in power but a decrease in covariation at base-paired positions [ 31 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 4A compares our probe of ATOM-1 to two state-of-the-art 3D structure prediction methods: RhoFold [38], the deep learning method with best performance from CASP15 [43], and RoseTTAFold2NA [39]. Notably, both RhoFold and RoseTTAFold2NA make use of MSAs which are time-consuming to generate and are often unavailable for RNAs of interest [11]. Despite having no access to MSAs and being considerably smaller (∼15M parameters) and shallower (2 layers) than RhoFold (∼100M parameters in 12 layers) and RoseTTAFold2NA (∼68M parameters in 40 layers), our probe produces predictions with higher global accuracy as measured by root mean-squared deviation (RMSD) [44] to experimental structures (Figure 4A).…”
Section: Tertiary Structure Predictionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, only 1% of entries in the Protein Data Bank (PDB) comprise RNA alone [9], despite the over 10-fold excess of genome intervals that produce RNA relative to proteins [10]. While evolutionary information encoded in multiple sequence alignments (MSAs) can provide critical insights on structure and function, these alignments are often shallow and uninformative for human targets and engineered sequences [11]. Consequently, state-of-the-art RNA structure and function prediction approaches fall short of the recent successes of highly accurate protein prediction methods [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%