1999
DOI: 10.1006/jaut.1998.0266
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thirteen Anti-Sm Monoclonal Antibodies Immunoprecipitate the Three Cytoplasmic snRNP Core Protein Precursors in Six Distinct Subsets

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
8
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
2
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Anti-Sm protein antibody immunoprecipitation experiments and Sm protein purification identified pre-snRNP Sm protein complexes of B/D3, D1/D2, and E/F/G (48,50). Our results show that in a 6S complex SmD3, but not SmB, is associated with pICln, and this is consistent with previous work showing that B and D3 are associated with each other in a 20S complex but not in a 6S complex (22,50,58). Our data show that SmD1 and SmD3 can interact with the 6S, JBP1-free pICln complex, and these associations do not require the carboxyl-terminal RG domains.…”
Section: Vol 21 2001supporting
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Anti-Sm protein antibody immunoprecipitation experiments and Sm protein purification identified pre-snRNP Sm protein complexes of B/D3, D1/D2, and E/F/G (48,50). Our results show that in a 6S complex SmD3, but not SmB, is associated with pICln, and this is consistent with previous work showing that B and D3 are associated with each other in a 20S complex but not in a 6S complex (22,50,58). Our data show that SmD1 and SmD3 can interact with the 6S, JBP1-free pICln complex, and these associations do not require the carboxyl-terminal RG domains.…”
Section: Vol 21 2001supporting
confidence: 92%
“…The sizes of cytoplasmic intermediates in snRNP assembly containing Sm proteins have been studied by sucrose gradient centrifugation (22,23,50). To examine the fractionation of cytoplasmic pICln and JBP1 on sucrose gradients in FIG.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This implies that extensive protein rearrangements are required for stable core RNP formation and that these rearrangements are rate limiting during core assembly. The stepwise assembly of the Sm protein complexes onto U snRNA (8,36) is likely to be an important regulatory control for U snRNP core assembly and suggests two ways, which are not mutually exclusive, in which RNA-protein interactions may be necessary to trigger protein rearrangements prior to stable association with U snRNA. The first possibility is that the protein interaction surfaces of the EFG (and perhaps also of the D1D2 and B/BЈD3) complex are blocked for association with the other Sm complexes until an initial RNA-protein contact(s) exposes them.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sm protein complexes assemble onto U snRNA in a stepwise and ordered manner. An initial and cooperative association of both the EFG and the D1D2 complexes with the U snRNA forms the U snRNP subcore particle (8,36). The U snRNP subcore is the only stable RNP intermediate formed during core RNP assembly and provides a unique binding site for the B/BЈD3 complex, whose association completes the core RNP particle (36,38).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%