2016
DOI: 10.1177/003335491613100206
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thirdhand Smoke: State of the Science and a Call for Policy Expansion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
38
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
1
38
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It may be important to implement hospital policies and interventions to reduce THS exposure, even ahead of collection of causal data, given the potential risks for NICU patients. Extending smoke-free policy definitions to include THS could have the added benefit to hasten the elimination of SHS in other environments 31 47What this paper adds

Thirdhand smoke (THS) contamination is unexplored in non-smoking, protected medical environments visited by smokers.

THS is estimated to take weeks to months to degrade in controlled environments.

Infants cared for during extended stays in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) are protected from secondhand smoke, but exposure to THS is unknown.

This study demonstrated that THS is deposited in rooms of NICU infants visited by smokers.

Data showed that NICU infants are exposed to nicotine and nicotine-derived, tobacco-specific carcinogens, raising the possibility of exposure due to THS re-emission in the NICU.

These data justify more formal research documenting acute and cumulative THS exposure, sources of exposure, means of prevention and associations with morbidity/mortality for NICU infants.

…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…It may be important to implement hospital policies and interventions to reduce THS exposure, even ahead of collection of causal data, given the potential risks for NICU patients. Extending smoke-free policy definitions to include THS could have the added benefit to hasten the elimination of SHS in other environments 31 47What this paper adds

Thirdhand smoke (THS) contamination is unexplored in non-smoking, protected medical environments visited by smokers.

THS is estimated to take weeks to months to degrade in controlled environments.

Infants cared for during extended stays in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) are protected from secondhand smoke, but exposure to THS is unknown.

This study demonstrated that THS is deposited in rooms of NICU infants visited by smokers.

Data showed that NICU infants are exposed to nicotine and nicotine-derived, tobacco-specific carcinogens, raising the possibility of exposure due to THS re-emission in the NICU.

These data justify more formal research documenting acute and cumulative THS exposure, sources of exposure, means of prevention and associations with morbidity/mortality for NICU infants.

…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…8 Although unexamined, there is concern that THS may be more toxic than SHS, given that THS includes novel pollutants not found in SHS, has multiple exposure routes and has a much longer duration of exposure. 912 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8 Although unexamined, there is concern that THS may be more toxic than SHS, given that THS includes novel pollutants not found in SHS, has multiple exposure routes and has a much longer duration of exposure. [9][10][11][12] The positive partial association between nicotine and cotinine indicates that, independent of age, hand nicotine can serve as a marker of OTS. The exposure may be through SHS or THS that accumulated in dust, on objects and on surfaces of the children's environments.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Smoking cessation programs and anti-smoking campaigns should emphasize that recent evidence on the health hazards of first-, second-and third-hand tobacco smoking. [36][37][38][39][40][41] The findings showed that former smokers less agreed than never smokers to ban smoking in restaurants. The dependency on nicotine that was experienced by former smokers may have contributed to that lenient attitude toward enforcing smoking banning.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%