Third Way Social Governance: Where is the State?

Abstract

The ‘Third Way’ politics of Blair's New Labour government of the United Kingdom has popularised a number of policy reforms centred on a supposedly new discourse of ‘devolution’, ‘inclusion’, ‘partnerships’ and ‘community’. These notions reflect a re‐emergence of the ideas and values of civil society, participation and localism. Key drivers of this discourse are: new conceptions of citizenship; a retreat from the social state to a politics of community; and a questioning of both ‘big‐state’ interventionist and competitive market approaches to public policy. These trends have resonance in the Australian context. The welfare reform agenda of the Australian Commonwealth government together with community building and engagement initiatives of State governments have been sites for these policy directions. Much of the debate surrounding these policies excludes or minimises the fundamental role of an active state by focusing on an uncritical conception of community. Drawing on the notion of network governance, an alternative framework for re‐conceptualising state‐community relations and delivering improved community outcomes is posited. The paper concludes by suggesting possible social governance methodologies for actioning this framework.

Reforming accountability in international NGOs: making sense of conflicting feedback

“…This mirrors the increasing value placed on responsiveness to stakeholders in wider social governance literatures (Reddell 2004). From this perspective, accountability arrangements that demand responsiveness by home office decision-makers to field office staff, partners, and communities are regarded as having intrinsic democratic value, insofar as they can empower field country constituencies to play more meaningful roles in the decision-making processes that affect them (Roche 2010).…”

Being different and the same? The paradoxes of ‘tailoring’ in education quasi - markets

“…In Australia and England, for example, the mid-1990s onwards have seen an explosion of forms of governance which seek to govern through community (Rose, 1999a(Rose, /b, 2000Everingham, 2001;Reddel, 2004;Miller & Rose, 2008;Savage, 2011;McLeod, 2012) . According to Miller and Rose (2008), this community turn is marked by a profound shift "in the ways of thinking and acting that used to be conducted in a "social" language" (p .…”

“…Sociological and political analyses of community governance have understood it as endogenous to Third Way variants of advanced liberalism (Rose, 1999a(Rose, /b, 2000Everingham, 2001;Reddel, 2004) . Community is understood, in this sense, as infused into a larger ensemble of Third Way technologies, especially those concerned with responsibilisation and "neo-social" approaches to governance (Rose, 1999a/b) .…”

Reconciling Expert Advice and Community Opinion in a Local Government Strategic Planning Process

“…The "New Public Management" approach was introduced in the 1980s in response to perceived deficiencies in contemporary management practice, with an emphasis on improved efficiencies, controlled costs, and increased cognizance of what were rather vaguely referred to as "competitive market forces" (Newton & van Deth, 2005). At the same time, the Blair government's professed desire to find a form of political middle ground, between conservative capitalism and liberal socialism, attempted to partner an overtly commercial and managerial stance with a complementary promotion of citizen-driven democracy through the principles of community governance (Reddel, 2004).…”