2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.pragma.2006.11.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Third turn position in teacher talk: Contingency and the work of teaching

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
131
1
15

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 189 publications
(151 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
4
131
1
15
Order By: Relevance
“…Teachers' feedback decisions determine whether time and space are even made available for work on understanding. Studies on the feedback turn reveal that teachers have an overwhelming number of options for providing feedback or using the turn in other ways (Jarvis & Robinson, 2007;Lee, 2007). The range of options can be narrowed depending on the type of task (Fagan, 2014), the teacher's level of expertise, and a teacher's knowledge of students' individual challenges and proficiency level (Fagan, 2014(Fagan, , 2015, among other factors.…”
Section: Managing Learner Talk In the Adult Esl Classroommentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Teachers' feedback decisions determine whether time and space are even made available for work on understanding. Studies on the feedback turn reveal that teachers have an overwhelming number of options for providing feedback or using the turn in other ways (Jarvis & Robinson, 2007;Lee, 2007). The range of options can be narrowed depending on the type of task (Fagan, 2014), the teacher's level of expertise, and a teacher's knowledge of students' individual challenges and proficiency level (Fagan, 2014(Fagan, , 2015, among other factors.…”
Section: Managing Learner Talk In the Adult Esl Classroommentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the first studies of classroom talk focused on teacher-learner interaction in classrooms with young learners in their native language (L1) (Barnes, 1976(Barnes, /1992Cazden, 2001;Lemke, 1990;Mehan, 1979), talk in adult English as a Second Language (ESL) classrooms has become an increasingly popular area of study over the last 10 years, where the focus has largely been on teacher/learner interactional patterns and how teachers manage student contributions and give feedback (Fagan, 2012(Fagan, , 2015Lee, 2007Lee, , 2008Markee, 1995;Waring, 2008Waring, , 2011Waring, , 2015. A handful of studies have focused on types of talk in the adult ESL classroom, such as teacher self-talk (Hall & Smotrova, 2013), and conversational talk vs. instructional talk (Waring, 2014), and what these types of talk seem to accomplish.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The IRF structure possesses flexible features, so that teachers can repeat and use various forms, particularly in the "F" move within the "triadic dialogue", depending on the activity goal [16]. Lee claimed that the instructor could provide the third move as "follow-up" by using techniques such as evaluation, justification, counter arguments, clarification and meta-talk, which can stepwise achieve the purposes of correcting errors, clarifying misconceptions, and guiding learning by repeated cycles of questioning and feedback [17]. Thus far, the IRF model commonly mimics teacher-student instructional dialogue, and has been used in various language learning scenarios [18] [19].…”
Section: The Irf Dialoguementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In doing so, we acknowledge that there are a number of important dialogic features identified in research with older children which reflect important features of elaborative style or reminiscing. This includes open questions (Albanese and Antoniotti 1997), reformulations and elaborations in teacher talk (Cullen 2002;Gillies and Khan 2008;Lee 2007;Roediger and Pyc 2012), affirming or repeating a child's utterance to incorporate it into a shared discourse (Cullen 1998;2002), and the use of memory-rich language (Coffman et al 2008;Grammer et al 2013). However, as mentioned previously, our focus is exclusively on the 0 to 5 age range, where reminiscing and elaborative style in parent-child interactions has demonstrated positive impact on children's outcomes.…”
Section: Research On Educator-child Dialog In Early Childhood Settingsmentioning
confidence: 99%