Third-Party Countermeasures in International Law

Dawidowicz, Martin

doi:10.1017/9781139046602

Cited by 83 publications

(6 citation statements)

References 163 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…70 Glej Dawidowicz (2016); Dawidowicz (2017, 239-84);Tams (2005, 250); Dopagne (2010); d 'Aspremont (2011); Sicilianos (2010Sicilianos ( , 1137.…”

Section: Teorija In Praksamentioning

confidence: 99%

Palestinsko-Izraelski Konflikt: Mednarodno Pravo – Quo Vadis?

T. Veber

2024

TIP

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Povzetek. Palestinsko-izraelski konflikt odpira številna mednarodnopravna vprašanja, ki so v prispevku analizirana z vidika pravice narodov do samoodločbe, prepovedi uporabe sile (jus ad bellum), mednarodnega prava oboroženih spopadov (jus in bello), pravil za ugotavljanje individualne odgovornosti in odgovornosti držav (jus post bellum) ter obveznosti mednarodne skupnosti pri odzivanju na grobe kršitve mednarodnega prava. Razumevanje teh pravil je nujno za ugotavljanje morebitne odgovornosti različnih akterjev, poleg tega pa razkriva dva vidika modernega mednarodnega prava. Na eni strani situacije uporabe sile nedržavnih akterjev tako z vidika jus ad bellum kot jus in bello terjajo poglobljeno analizo in odpirajo številna vprašanja, na katere »na državno suverenost« osredinjeno mednarodno pravo nima enoznačnih odgovorov. Po drugi strani pa se s pripoznanjem erga omnes (partes) narave nekaterih obveznosti iz področja prava človekovih pravic ter oboroženih spopadov, vse bolj utemeljuje prepričanje, da se vse države v mednarodni skupnosti lahko odzivajo na najhujše kršitve mednarodnega prava in uveljavljajo odgovornost zadevne države. Vendar pa prispevek zaključi, da selektivnost implementacije ob odsotnosti politične volje ostaja temeljna pomanjkljivost mednarodnega prava, za katero se zdi, da jo bo težko premostilo. Ključni pojmi: Palestina, nedržavni akterji, odgovornost, pravica narodov do samoodločbe, pravica do samoobrambe, mednarodno pravo oboroženih spopadov, erga omnes (partes).

show abstract

“…70 Glej Dawidowicz (2016); Dawidowicz (2017, 239-84);Tams (2005, 250); Dopagne (2010); d 'Aspremont (2011); Sicilianos (2010Sicilianos ( , 1137.…”

Section: Teorija In Praksamentioning

confidence: 99%

Palestinsko-Izraelski Konflikt: Mednarodno Pravo – Quo Vadis?

T. Veber

2024

TIP

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Rather, it should be referred to as freedom. 12 As a result, it is not a legal concept, but a descriptive category (or technical term), 13 which has no direct legal effect. 14 Freedom, unlike right, is not limited by conditions.…”

Section: Baltic Journal Of Law and Politicsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Retorsion: An Underrated Retaliatory Measure Against Malign Cyber Operations

Spáčil

2024

Baltic Journal of Law &Amp; Politics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The articles discusses the application of the concept of retorsion in relation to defensive measures against hostile cyber operations. Retorsion is a concept not regulated by international law, which gives the victim state a high degree of flexibility in its use. However, its limits are formed by the rules of international law (retorsion is an unfriendly act not prohibited by international law). The paper is divided into three main parts. The first part discusses the concept of retorsion in general terms and its relation to cyber operations, the second part defines the relationship between retorsion, countermeasures, plea of necessity and the right of self-defence, and the third part consists of in-depth analysis of states’ practice. The analysis of states’ practices includes both the actual measures that states have taken in response to cyber operations (e.g. expulsion of diplomats, economic sanctions, travel bans) and official statements on the issue that have been published, particularly in the period 2019–2022. Attention is also paid to the possibilities of using retorsion against cyber operations carried out by non-state actors.

show abstract

“…XXI GATT (Kithardis, 2016;Pelc, 2016;Ravikumar, 2016;Dawidowicz, 2017) Art. XXI GATT provides for the security exception directly 22Globalization and its impact on the full enjoyment of all human rights-Preliminary Report of the Secretary General, UN DocA/55/342, 31 August 2000, par.…”

Section: Economic Restrictions Against the Russian Federation And Int...mentioning

confidence: 99%

The economic effects of the sanctions imposed on the Russian Federation

Yui¹

2023

yeucl

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The restrictive measures imposed on the Russian federation concern not only the State but also the entities and some people of power. These measures include the freezing of funds, illegal economic resources of a technical or material nature but also those that are oriented towards the production and use of chemical weapons and/or acts that help and encourage such activity. This research focuses mainly on the type of the aforementioned sanctions by the European Union. This work also seeks to analyze the legal effectiveness of these sanctions within the circle of the United Nations and World Trade Organization (WTO). Finally, the proposal of new types of sanctions, but also the setting of new rules against the Russian federation are the final objective of our work.

show abstract

Third-Party Countermeasures in International Law

Cited by 83 publications

References 163 publications

Palestinsko-Izraelski Konflikt: Mednarodno Pravo – Quo Vadis?

Palestinsko-Izraelski Konflikt: Mednarodno Pravo – Quo Vadis?

Retorsion: An Underrated Retaliatory Measure Against Malign Cyber Operations

The economic effects of the sanctions imposed on the Russian Federation

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About