2012
DOI: 10.1007/s10509-012-1038-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Third-order secular Solution of the variational equations of motion of a satellite in orbit around a non-spherical planet

Abstract: We constructed an analytical theory of satellite motion up to the third order relative to the oblateness parameter of the Earth (J 2 ). Equations of secular variations was developed for the first three orbital elements (a, e, i) of an artificial satellite. The secular variations are solved in a closed form.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As only the zonal perturbation terms of geopotentials are considered in the design of reference repeat-groundtrack orbit, the Earth gravity field is axially symmetric (Kozai 1959;Ammar et al 2012). Thus, the disturbing potential acting on the satellite can be formulized as the series of zonal harmonics from Kaula (1963Kaula ( , 1966 …”
Section: -24mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As only the zonal perturbation terms of geopotentials are considered in the design of reference repeat-groundtrack orbit, the Earth gravity field is axially symmetric (Kozai 1959;Ammar et al 2012). Thus, the disturbing potential acting on the satellite can be formulized as the series of zonal harmonics from Kaula (1963Kaula ( , 1966 …”
Section: -24mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…+β 3 cos (4i) + β 4 cos (6i)) + J 3 2 R 6 n t a 6 (︀ 1 − e 2 )︀ 19/2 (β5 where the subscript (ob) stands for oblateness, µ is the Newtonian constant times mass of Earth, R the mean equatorial radius of the Earth, ω the argument of the perigee, J k the zonal harmonics, given by J 2 = 1.08263 × 10 −3 , J 3 = − 2.5322 × 10 −6 , J 4 = −1.6110 × 10 −6 , D 4 = J 2 2 + J 4 = −0.4389122 × 10 −6 , and α i and β j , i = 1, . .…”
Section: The Perturbation Due To Oblatenessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A semi-analytic theory for a low Earth orbit satellite, taking into account the perturbations due to Earth's oblateness and atmospheric drag *Corresponding Author: Mohamed R. Amin: Mathematics Department., College of Sciences and Arts, Qassim University, AlRass, Saudi Arabia; Theoretical Physics Dept., National Research Centre, Dokki, Giza, Egypt; Email: m.abdelhameid@qu.edu.sa was considered by Bezdek (2004) [5]. Ammar et al (2012) [6] studied the satellite motion under the Earth's oblateness up to the third order. They showed that the Earth's oblateness had a secular perturbation on the semi-major axis and on the eccentricity of the satellite orbit.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…They found that, these points are stable for 0 C µ µ < < and unstable for 1 2 C µ µ < < , and C µ depends on the radiating and oblateness coefficients. The influence of the eccentricity of the orbits of the primary bodies with or without radiation pressures on the existence of the equilibrium points and their stability was touched upon to an extent by [16], [19] and [20].…”
Section: µ µmentioning
confidence: 99%