2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.jlumin.2009.02.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Third-order nonlinear optical response in double-walled carbon nanotubes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…DWNTs, formed by two concentric SWNTs 55 , offer strong third-order optical nonlinearity comparable to those of SWNTs 56 and broadband absorption 57 . The combination of metallic (m-) and semiconducting (s-) inner and outer walls increases their carrier relaxation speed due to tunnelling from s- to m-tubes 58 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DWNTs, formed by two concentric SWNTs 55 , offer strong third-order optical nonlinearity comparable to those of SWNTs 56 and broadband absorption 57 . The combination of metallic (m-) and semiconducting (s-) inner and outer walls increases their carrier relaxation speed due to tunnelling from s- to m-tubes 58 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 60 , 61 Indeed, experimental observations indicate that the relaxation times of inner nanotubes of DWNTs are comparable or shorter 60 , 62 , 63 than the SWNTs of same species. For example, Nakamura et al ( 57 ) showed that, under the same experimental conditions, the exciton decay time for (7,6) inner tubes in DWNTs is 0.65 ps, compared to 3.2 ps for a (7,6) SWNT species due to shorter exciton decay time and energy relaxation from inner to outer tubes 57 via exciton energy transfer (EET). 64 , 65 …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…60,61 Indeed, experimental observations indicate that the relaxation times of inner nanotubes of DWNTs are comparable or shorter 60,62,63 than the SWNTs of same species. For example, Nakamura et al 57 showed that, under the same experimental conditions, the exciton decay time for (7,6) inner tubes in DWNTs is 0.65 ps, compared to 3.2 ps for a (7,6) SWNT species due to shorter exciton decay time and energy relaxation from inner to outer tubes 57 via exciton energy transfer (EET). 64,65 The strong third-order optical nonlinearity, ultrafast carrier dynamics, 48,55À57,63 and wide optical absorption 57,66 make DWNTs with ∼1.6À1.8 nm outer diameter very attractive for ultrafast photonic applications in the 1 to 2 μm range.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…41,42,44 Further recent studies for cross-polarized excitons revealed that dark excitons, located below bright excitons in energy, become optically allowed due to weak electron-hole asymmetry. [45][46][47] Optical spectra of carbon nanotubes have been measured in various environments such as for self-assembled tubes, 3,5,[48][49][50] tubes suspended in air, 4,7,8,10,12,51 and tubes in the presence of surrounding materials such as surfactants and solvents. 1,3,6,7,9,11,[13][14][15][16]34 It has often been shown that exciton energies in the above environments are reduced in comparison with those in tubes in air or vacuum.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%