2020
DOI: 10.1103/physreva.101.063829
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Third-order exceptional point and successive switching among three states in an optical microcavity

Abstract: One of the most intriguing topological features of open systems is exhibiting exceptional point (EP) singularities. Apart from the widely explored second-order EPs (EP2s), the explorations of higher-order EPs in any system requires more complex topology, which is still a challenge. Here, we encounter a third-order EP (EP3) for the first time in a simple fabrication feasible gain-loss assisted optical microcavity. Using scattering-matrix formalism, we study the simultaneous interactions between three successive… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Then, we will demonstrate and compare four types of common nanostructures used for generating and confining light and controlling the light characteristics, namely, optical waveguide, [24][25][26][27][28][29][30] photonic crystal, [24,[31][32][33][34][35][36] metasurface, [37][38][39][40][41][42] and microcavity. [43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52] Although they differ in shape or arrangement, these nanostructures can sometimes be designed to achieve similar functions, while different structures have their unique advantages. Therefore, it is of great importance to identify the functions and applications realized by different nanostructures which are useful for rationally selecting the corresponding structures in different application circumstances and finding new research trends in specific interactions.…”
Section: Light-atom Interaction Affected By Nanostructuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then, we will demonstrate and compare four types of common nanostructures used for generating and confining light and controlling the light characteristics, namely, optical waveguide, [24][25][26][27][28][29][30] photonic crystal, [24,[31][32][33][34][35][36] metasurface, [37][38][39][40][41][42] and microcavity. [43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52] Although they differ in shape or arrangement, these nanostructures can sometimes be designed to achieve similar functions, while different structures have their unique advantages. Therefore, it is of great importance to identify the functions and applications realized by different nanostructures which are useful for rationally selecting the corresponding structures in different application circumstances and finding new research trends in specific interactions.…”
Section: Light-atom Interaction Affected By Nanostructuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[17,18] To realize multiple oscillation quenching states in a given system and achieve an all-optical transition between these states, we investigate a triatomic PT-symmetric photonic molecule composed of one Hermitian and linear resonator and two non-Hermitian and nonlinear resonators (Figure 1). In the linear regime, the triatomic PT-symmetric system has been widely studied to utilize higher-order exceptional points (EPs) [12,[21][22][23][24][25] for enhanced sensitivity, [12] mechanical cooling, [21] cavity magnonics systems, [23] successive state conversion, [24] and wireless power transfer. [22,25] To extend the higher-order EP system into memory functions, we employ the emergence of oscillation quenching states and the transition between them, realizing binary (ON-OFF) stable states (Figure 1).…”
Section: Model Definitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides only EP2s, relative theoretical schemes [29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38] and experimental realizations [15,[39][40][41][42][43][44][45] have been raised to investigate higher-order EPs, owing to the 𝑛th-root response near an 𝑛th-order EPs is extremely sensitive to the external perturbation, in contrast to the squareroot response near an EP2. Higher sensitivity requires more demanding experimental conditions, all parameters have to be precisely controlled to prepare the system on EPs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%