2000
DOI: 10.5558/tfc76445-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Third Millennium Forestry: What climate change might mean to forests and forest management in Ontario

Abstract: Climate change may profoundly influence Ontario's forest ecosystems and their management. Elevated atmospheric C 0 2 concentrations, increased temperature and altered precipitation regimes will affect forest vegetation through their influence on physiological (e.g., photosynthesis, respiration) and ecological processes (e.g., net primary production, decomposition), and may result in dramatic northward shifts in the natural range of forest types and species. More importantly, climate change is expected to incre… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
66
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
(83 reference statements)
1
66
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Second, the preferred habitat type of woodland caribou identified within our models (e.g., dense coniferous forest) was currently found in greater quantity in the southwestern portion of northern Ontario. If distributions of preferred habitat shift in response to climate change (as has been suggested by other studies; e.g., Lui, 1990;Parker et al, 2000;Price et al, 2013) our predictions of woodland caribou occurrence would follow changes in landscape patterns of this habitat. Thus, future woodland caribou ranges will not be a straightforward northerly shift, but a function of several sources of uncertainty including habitat, climate and linear disturbances across northern Ontario.…”
Section: Climate Change and Woodland Caribousupporting
confidence: 55%
“…Second, the preferred habitat type of woodland caribou identified within our models (e.g., dense coniferous forest) was currently found in greater quantity in the southwestern portion of northern Ontario. If distributions of preferred habitat shift in response to climate change (as has been suggested by other studies; e.g., Lui, 1990;Parker et al, 2000;Price et al, 2013) our predictions of woodland caribou occurrence would follow changes in landscape patterns of this habitat. Thus, future woodland caribou ranges will not be a straightforward northerly shift, but a function of several sources of uncertainty including habitat, climate and linear disturbances across northern Ontario.…”
Section: Climate Change and Woodland Caribousupporting
confidence: 55%
“…Even as our climate seems to change (Parker et al 2000), many argue that efforts should be made to maintain functioning ecosystems similar to those that were found historically across landscapes (Brown et al 2001). Such maintenance, however, will require developing replacement stands of appropriate species and structures that provide acceptable, potentially historical, forest cover patterns.…”
Section: Landscape-level Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Promote natural regeneration Replant using a mix of species in order to maximise the chances of success under new climatic conditions Replicate the natural regeneration composition if it is insufficient Monitor growth Implement silvicultural practices that favour growth (thinning, partial cuts) Use thinning and selective cutting to remove trees that are suppressed, damaged, or of poor quality Adapt silvicultural practices and principles to maintain optimum species-site association Evaluate the improvement of genotypes over the long-term in a variety of climatic and environmental conditions When planting, use seeds or seedlings with the genotype best adapted to the anticipated future climatic conditions (Parker et al 2000, Spittlehouse and Stewart 2003, Millar et al 2007, Williamson et al 2009). This may mean genotypes obtained from sites further south in the case of the Triad project, whose region covers a large latitudinal gradient, or from sites at lower altitudes for the case of the LWR…”
Section: Changes In Tree Growthmentioning
confidence: 99%